Blais Jules M, Macdonald Robie W, Mackay Donald, Webster Eva, Harvey Colin, Smol John P
Program for Chemical and Environmental Toxicology, Department of Biology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, K1N 6N5, Canada.
Environ Sci Technol. 2007 Feb 15;41(4):1075-84. doi: 10.1021/es061314a.
The prevailing view is that long-range transport of semivolatile contaminants is primarily conducted by the physical system (e.g., winds, currents), and biological transport is typically ignored. Although this view may be correct in terms of bulk budgets and fluxes, it neglects the potential of animals to focus contaminants into foodwebs due to their behaviors and lifecycles. In particular, gregarious animals that biomagnify and bioaccumulate certain contaminants and then migrate and congregate can become the predominant pathway for contaminants in many circumstances. Fish and birds provide prominent examples for such behavior. This review examines the potential for biovector transport to expose populations to contaminants. In addition, we apply a modeling approach to compare the potential of biovector transport to other physical transport pathways for a hypothetical lake receiving large numbers of fish. We conclude that biovector transport should not be neglected when considering environmental risks of biomagnifying contaminants.
普遍观点认为,半挥发性污染物的长距离传输主要由物理系统(如风和洋流)进行,而生物传输通常被忽略。尽管从总量预算和通量的角度来看,这种观点可能是正确的,但它忽视了动物因其行为和生命周期而将污染物集中到食物网中的潜力。特别是那些会生物放大和生物累积某些污染物,然后迁移并聚集的群居动物,在许多情况下可能成为污染物的主要传输途径。鱼类和鸟类就是这种行为的突出例子。本综述探讨了生物载体传输使种群接触污染物的可能性。此外,我们采用一种建模方法,比较生物载体传输与其他物理传输途径对一个接收大量鱼类的假想湖泊的潜在影响。我们得出结论,在考虑生物放大污染物的环境风险时,生物载体传输不应被忽视。