Ansseau Marc, Fischler Benjamin, Dierick Michel, Albert Adelin, Leyman Sophie, Mignon Annick
Department of Psychiatry and Medical Psychology, University of Liège, C.H.U. du Sart Tilman (B35), B-4000 Liège, Belgium.
Depress Anxiety. 2008;25(6):506-13. doi: 10.1002/da.20306.
A previous Generalized Anxiety Disorder Impact Survey (GADIS I) performed on 15,399 Belgian patients consulting their primary care physicians, revealed high prevalences of generalized anxiety disorder (GAD) and major depression (MD) with important regional differences. The objective of this study (GADIS II) was to replicate previous findings and to evaluate the role of socioeconomic factors in the diagnoses of GAD and MD. A large-scale cross-sectional survey was conducted in a random sample of 377 general practitioners distributed geographically over Belgium and Luxemburg. Each physician was asked to screen 40 consecutive patients at predefined time periods for the presence of GAD and MD using sections of the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI). Socioeconomic parameters were collected. The level of impairment was assessed using the Sheehan Disability Scale. In a sample of 13,699 patients, point prevalences of GAD and of MD were found to be 13.4 and 11.0%, respectively. Overall, 17.8% of the population was positive for GAD and/or MD. Both disorders were significantly more frequent in women than in men. Marked regional differences were observed with prevalences for GAD and/or MD of 24.2% in Brussels, 22.7% in Wallonia, 13.6% in Luxemburg and 12.9% in Flanders. Several socioeconomic factors were significantly associated with positive diagnoses: living alone, a low level of education and unemployment. However, regional differences remained significant even after controlling for socioeconomic factors. The study confirms the high prevalence of GAD and MD in primary care and the role of several socioeconomic and regional factors in the illnesses.
先前对比利时15399名向初级保健医生咨询的患者进行的广泛性焦虑症影响调查(GADIS I)显示,广泛性焦虑症(GAD)和重度抑郁症(MD)的患病率很高,且存在重要的地区差异。本研究(GADIS II)的目的是重复先前的研究结果,并评估社会经济因素在GAD和MD诊断中的作用。在比利时和卢森堡各地随机抽取的377名全科医生中进行了一项大规模横断面调查。要求每位医生在预定时间段内连续筛查40名患者,使用迷你国际神经精神访谈(MINI)的部分内容来确定是否存在GAD和MD。收集了社会经济参数。使用希恩残疾量表评估损害程度。在13699名患者的样本中,发现GAD和MD的点患病率分别为13.4%和11.0%。总体而言,17.8%的人群GAD和/或MD呈阳性。这两种疾病在女性中比在男性中更为常见。观察到明显的地区差异,布鲁塞尔GAD和/或MD的患病率为24.2%,瓦隆地区为22.7%,卢森堡为13.6%,佛兰德为12.9%。几个社会经济因素与阳性诊断显著相关:独居、低教育水平和失业。然而,即使在控制了社会经济因素之后,地区差异仍然显著。该研究证实了GAD和MD在初级保健中的高患病率,以及几个社会经济和地区因素在这些疾病中的作用。