Duration of chemotherapy with topotecan influences survival in recurrent ovarian cancer: a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE

This meta-analysis compares the feasibility, safety and clinical outcome of long-term therapy with topotecan vs. standard treatment duration in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data of 523 patients from five clinical trials were reviewed and retrospectively allocated into two groups. Those patients who received 6 or fewer courses were compared to those with 7 or more courses of intravenous topotecan. Response rates, overall survival and toxicity profiles were compared between these groups.

RESULTS

One hundred and fifty-two (29%) patients received 7 or more courses and 371 patients (71%) received up to 6 courses of topotecan. Hematological toxicity was significant but similar in both treatment groups and was not cumulative. Non-hematological toxicity was generally mild. Eighty-seven (17%) patients responded to topotecan treatment, 66 of these patients received 7 or more courses of therapy. In total, 14 patients experienced their initial response at or after course 6 of therapy. Within the subset of patients with response or disease stabilization at course 6, those who stopped treatment at course 6 for reasons other than progressive disease or adverse events had a median survival of 83.6 weeks and those who continued treatment for longer than 6 courses had a significantly longer median survival of 107.0 weeks.

CONCLUSION

Chemotherapy with 7 or more courses of topotecan in recurrent ovarian cancer is feasible with no evidence of cumulative toxicity. The results of this retrospective analysis suggest a potential for late response and a survival benefit for those patients without disease progression who continue topotecan therapy beyond 6 cycles of treatment.