Suppr超能文献

在热应激期间,颞部测温法无法追踪身体核心温度。

Temporal thermometry fails to track body core temperature during heat stress.

作者信息

Low David A, Vu Albert, Brown Marilee, Davis Scott L, Keller David M, Levine Benjamin D, Crandall Craig G

机构信息

Institute for Exercise and Environmental Medicine, Presbyterian Hospital of Dallas, Dallas, TX 75231, USA.

出版信息

Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007 Jul;39(7):1029-35. doi: 10.1249/mss.0b013e318050ca3e.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of temporal scanning thermometry in monitoring internal temperature increases during passive heating.

METHODS

Sixteen subjects (5 males and 11 females) underwent a whole-body passive heat stress (water-perfused suit) to increase internal temperature. Temperatures were obtained with a temporal scanner and with an ingestible-pill telemetry system that tracks intestinal temperature. Temperatures were recorded while subjects were normothermic (34 degrees C water-perfusing suit) and every 10 min during passive heating (48 degrees C water-perfusing suit).

RESULTS

Heart rate (ECG), mean skin temperature (weighted six-site average), skin blood flow (laser Doppler flowmetry), and sweat rate (capacitance hygrometry) were all significantly elevated at the end of heating (all P < 0.001). Pre-heat stress temporal-derived temperature was not different from intestinal temperature (36.98 +/- 0.09 vs 37.01 +/- 0.09 degrees C, respectively, P = 0.76). However, after 30 min of heating (the greatest duration of heating completed by all subjects), temporal-derived temperature decreased to below the pre-heat stress baseline (-0.22 +/- 0.11), whereas intestinal temperature increased by 0.39 +/- 0.07 degrees C (P < 0.001 between the two methods). After 50 min of heating (N = 11), intestinal-derived internal temperature increased by 0.70 +/- 0.09 degrees C, whereas temporal-derived temperature decreased by 0.29 +/- 0.10 degrees C (P < 0.001). The group average (+/- SEM) R2 and slope between the two methods were 0.29 +/- 0.08 and -0.34 +/- 0.14, respectively.

CONCLUSION

These results demonstrate that temporal scanning does not track internal temperature, as measured via intestinal temperature, during passive heating. Given these findings, it is recommended that this technique not be used to assess temperature in hyperthermic diaphoretic subjects.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估在被动加热过程中,颞部扫描测温法监测体内温度升高的准确性。

方法

16名受试者(5名男性和11名女性)接受全身被动热应激(水灌注服)以升高体内温度。使用颞部扫描仪和可摄入药丸遥测系统获取温度,该系统可追踪肠道温度。在受试者体温正常时(水灌注服温度34℃)以及被动加热期间(水灌注服温度48℃)每10分钟记录一次温度。

结果

加热结束时,心率(心电图)、平均皮肤温度(六点加权平均值)、皮肤血流量(激光多普勒血流仪)和出汗率(电容式湿度计)均显著升高(均P<0.001)。热应激前颞部测量的温度与肠道温度无差异(分别为36.98±0.09℃和37.01±0.09℃,P = 0.76)。然而,加热30分钟后(所有受试者完成的最长加热时间),颞部测量的温度降至热应激前基线以下(-0.22±0.11),而肠道温度升高了0.39±0.07℃(两种方法之间P<0.001)。加热50分钟后(N = 11),肠道测量的体内温度升高了0.70±0.09℃,而颞部测量的温度降低了0.29±0.10℃(P<0.001)。两种方法之间的组平均值(±SEM)R2和斜率分别为0.29±0.08和-0.34±0.14。

结论

这些结果表明,在被动加热过程中,颞部扫描无法追踪通过肠道温度测量的体内温度。基于这些发现,建议不使用该技术评估高热多汗受试者的体温。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验