• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

捷克共和国的宫颈癌筛查

Cervical cancer screening in the Czech Republic.

作者信息

Tachezy Ruth, Rob Lukás

机构信息

Department of Experimental Virology, National Reference Laboratory for Papillomaviruses, Institute of Hematology and Blood Transfusion, Prague, Czech Republic.

出版信息

Coll Antropol. 2007 Apr;31 Suppl 2:27-9.

PMID:17598501
Abstract

Cytological diagnosis of atypical cells of cervix uteri by the Papanicolaou method was introduced in the Czech Republic (CR) very early - in 1947. The first data on the incidence of cervical cancer in CR are available from 1960 when the rate was 32.3 cases/10(5) women. In 1966 the Czech National Health Law was passed that guaranteed women a yearly preventive examination by a gynaecologist including screening for cervical carcinoma that would be covered by the compulsory health insurance. Notwithstanding high frequency of screening visits and the fact that all women are eligible, the incidence of CC has not changed in the last 34 years. The reasons for this include the coverage of Czech women, which is estimated to be low (50% at the most), and that none of the cytology laboratories are accredited for screening, there are no national registries for any aspect of screening and there are no mechanisms for evaluation of the screening process. As a result, it is likely that the majority of cervical screening activity that is undertaken is ineffective and the implementation of an organised and quality controlled screening programme, in compliance with the recommendations of many European Institutions, is urgently required to ensure that Czech women are properly protected against this disease and that scarce healthcare resources are used in the most cost-effective manner.

摘要

巴氏涂片法对子宫颈非典型细胞进行细胞学诊断早在1947年就已引入捷克共和国(CR)。CR关于宫颈癌发病率的首批数据可追溯到1960年,当时发病率为32.3例/10⁵名女性。1966年通过了捷克国家卫生法,该法保障女性每年接受妇科医生的预防性检查,包括宫颈癌筛查,费用由强制健康保险支付。尽管筛查就诊频率很高,而且所有女性都有资格接受筛查,但在过去34年里宫颈癌的发病率并未改变。原因包括据估计捷克女性的筛查覆盖率较低(最多50%),而且没有任何细胞学实验室获得筛查认证,没有关于筛查任何方面的国家登记系统,也没有评估筛查过程的机制。因此,很可能大多数进行的子宫颈筛查活动是无效的,迫切需要按照许多欧洲机构的建议实施有组织且质量可控的筛查计划,以确保捷克女性得到适当的疾病防护,并以最具成本效益的方式使用稀缺的医疗资源。

相似文献

1
Cervical cancer screening in the Czech Republic.捷克共和国的宫颈癌筛查
Coll Antropol. 2007 Apr;31 Suppl 2:27-9.
2
[Screening for prevention of cervical cancer in the Czech Republic].[捷克共和国宫颈癌预防筛查]
Cas Lek Cesk. 2007;146(12):939-44.
3
Cervical cancer screening in Serbia.塞尔维亚的宫颈癌筛查
Coll Antropol. 2007 Apr;31 Suppl 2:31-6.
4
Consensus recommendations for cervical cancer prevention in the Czech Republic: a report of the International Conference on Human Papillomavirus in Human Pathology (Prague, 1-3 May 2008).捷克共和国宫颈癌预防共识建议:人乳头瘤病毒在人类病理学国际会议报告(2008年5月1 - 3日,布拉格)
J Med Screen. 2008;15(4):207-10. doi: 10.1258/jms.2008.008057.
5
[Results of the Czech National Cervical Cancer screening programme].[捷克国家宫颈癌筛查计划的结果]
Klin Onkol. 2014;27 Suppl 2:79-86.
6
Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of nationwide cervical cancer screening in Taiwan.台湾地区全国性子宫颈癌筛查的效果与成本效益
J Med Screen. 2006;13 Suppl 1:S44-7.
7
Challenges in starting organised screening programmes for cervical cancer in the new member states of the European Union.欧盟新成员国启动宫颈癌有组织筛查项目面临的挑战。
Eur J Cancer. 2009 Oct;45(15):2679-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2009.07.025. Epub 2009 Aug 19.
8
Cervical cancer screening: A Slovenian experience.宫颈癌筛查:斯洛文尼亚的经验
Coll Antropol. 2007 Apr;31 Suppl 2:23-6.
9
Cervical cancer screening programs: summary of the 1982. Canadian task force report.宫颈癌筛查项目:1982年加拿大特别工作组报告摘要
Can Med Assoc J. 1982 Oct 1;127(7):581-9.
10
High-grade cervical abnormalities and screening intervals in New South Wales, Australia.澳大利亚新南威尔士州的高级别宫颈异常与筛查间隔
J Med Screen. 2008;15(1):36-43. doi: 10.1258/jms.2008.007036.