Allen Elizabeth S, Baucom Donald H
Department of Psychology, University of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center, CB 173, PO Box 173364, Denver, CO 80217, USA.
J Sex Res. 2006 Nov;43(4):307-17. doi: 10.1080/00224490609552330.
Patterns of extradyadic involvement (EDI) were assessed for three samples: an undergraduate dating sample and a community marital sample reporting on an actual experience of EDI, and an undergraduate sample which denied recent EDI and was asked to imagine a hypothetical experience of EDI. Good consistency of responses within and between measures was found for the hypothetical EDI sample. Persons reporting on a hypothetical EDI were generally less approving of EDI and imagined that they would experience higher levels of primary relationship satisfaction, overall remorse, and specific types of distress, particularly in comparison to the dating EDI group. Relative to the dating EDI group, the marital EDI group recalled greater dissonance with the EDI behavior, more concern about disapproval from others, and higher levels of intimacy, self-esteem, and love reasons for the EDI. No differences were found among the groups on the level of emotional closeness with the extradyadic partner.
对三个样本的婚外情卷入模式（EDI）进行了评估：一个是报告实际婚外情卷入经历的本科约会样本和社区婚姻样本，另一个是否认近期有婚外情卷入并被要求想象一次假设的婚外情卷入经历的本科样本。对于假设的婚外情卷入样本，在各测量指标内部和之间发现了良好的反应一致性。报告假设婚外情卷入的人通常对婚外情卷入的认可度较低，并想象他们会经历更高水平的主要关系满意度、总体悔恨以及特定类型的困扰，特别是与约会婚外情卷入组相比。相对于约会婚外情卷入组，婚姻婚外情卷入组回忆起与婚外情卷入行为的更大失调、对他人不认可的更多担忧，以及婚外情卷入的更高亲密程度、自尊和爱的理由。在与婚外情伴侣的情感亲密程度上，各组之间没有差异。
