Suppr超能文献

万古霉素与甲硝唑治疗艰难梭菌相关性腹泻的比较,按疾病严重程度分层

A comparison of vancomycin and metronidazole for the treatment of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea, stratified by disease severity.

作者信息

Zar Fred A, Bakkanagari Srinivasa R, Moorthi K M L S T, Davis Melinda B

机构信息

University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL 60612-7323, USA.

出版信息

Clin Infect Dis. 2007 Aug 1;45(3):302-7. doi: 10.1086/519265. Epub 2007 Jun 19.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The incidence and severity of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD) has been increasing, and there have been recent reports of metronidazole treatment failure. Metronidazole is still commonly used as first-line treatment for CDAD but has never been compared with vancomycin in a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. We conducted such a trial, stratifying patients according to disease severity, to investigate whether one agent was superior for treating either mild or severe disease.

METHODS

From October 1994 through June 2002, patients with CDAD were stratified according to whether they had mild or severe disease based on clinical criteria and were randomly assigned to receive oral metronidazole (250 mg 4 times per day) or oral vancomycin (125 mg 4 times per day) for 10 days. Both groups received an oral placebo in addition to the study drug. Patients were followed up for 21 days to assess cure, treatment failure, relapse, or intolerance.

RESULTS

One hundred seventy-two patients were enrolled, and 150 of these patients successfully completed the trial. Among the patients with mild CDAD, treatment with metronidazole or vancomycin resulted in clinical cure in 90% and 98% of the patients, respectively (P=.36). Among the patients with severe CDAD, treatment with metronidazole or vancomycin resulted in clinical cure in 76% and 97% of the patients, respectively (P=.02). Clinical symptoms recurred in 15% of the patients treated with metronidazole and 14% of those treated with vancomycin.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that metronidazole and vancomycin are equally effective for the treatment of mild CDAD, but vancomycin is superior for treating patients with severe CDAD.

摘要

背景

艰难梭菌相关性腹泻(CDAD)的发病率和严重程度一直在上升,近期有甲硝唑治疗失败的报道。甲硝唑仍是CDAD常用的一线治疗药物,但从未在一项前瞻性、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验中与万古霉素进行比较。我们进行了这样一项试验,根据疾病严重程度对患者进行分层,以研究两种药物在治疗轻度或重度疾病方面是否有一方更具优势。

方法

从1994年10月至2002年6月,根据临床标准将CDAD患者按疾病严重程度分为轻度或重度,并随机分配接受口服甲硝唑(每日4次,每次250毫克)或口服万古霉素(每日4次,每次125毫克)治疗10天。两组除研究药物外均接受口服安慰剂。对患者进行21天的随访,以评估治愈、治疗失败、复发或不耐受情况。

结果

共纳入172例患者,其中150例成功完成试验。在轻度CDAD患者中,甲硝唑治疗组和万古霉素治疗组的临床治愈率分别为90%和98%(P = 0.36)。在重度CDAD患者中,甲硝唑治疗组和万古霉素治疗组的临床治愈率分别为76%和97%(P = 0.02)。接受甲硝唑治疗的患者中有15%出现临床症状复发,接受万古霉素治疗的患者中有14%出现复发。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,甲硝唑和万古霉素在治疗轻度CDAD方面同样有效,但万古霉素在治疗重度CDAD患者方面更具优势。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验