• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

拔管力度:胶布固定与气管插管固定器的比较

Extubation force: tape versus endotracheal tube holders.

作者信息

Carlson Jestin, Mayrose James, Krause Richard, Jehle Dietrich

机构信息

State University of New York at Buffalo, Department of Emergency Medicine, Buffalo, NY, USA.

出版信息

Ann Emerg Med. 2007 Dec;50(6):686-91. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.05.013. Epub 2007 Jun 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.05.013
PMID:17599694
Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Tape is the standard method for securing endotracheal tubes to prevent extubation. This study examines the force required to extubate endotracheal tubes from cadavers with either tape or one of 4 commercially available endotracheal tube holders.

METHODS

Newly deceased, unembalmed cadavers were intubated with standard tracheal intubation techniques. The endotracheal tube was secured with either tape or one of 4 commercially available endotracheal tube holders. The endotracheal tube was then connected to a force-measuring device and pulled until the cuff was removed from the trachea. The largest force recorded on the device was then marked as the "extubation force" for that trial.

RESULTS

When tape was used to secure the endotracheal tube, it required a significantly larger force to extubate than 3 of 4 off-the-shelf endotracheal tube holders. Only the Thomas Tube Holder secured the endotracheal tube better than tape.

CONCLUSION

Although the Thomas Tube Holder had the greatest holding force in this study, tape was shown to be the least expensive and outperformed 3 other commercially available devices used to secure endotracheal tubes.

摘要

研究目的

胶布是固定气管导管以防止脱管的标准方法。本研究考察了从尸体上拔除用胶布或4种市售气管导管固定器之一固定的气管导管所需的力量。

方法

采用标准气管插管技术对刚死亡、未防腐处理的尸体进行插管。气管导管用胶布或4种市售气管导管固定器之一固定。然后将气管导管连接到测力装置上并拉动,直到套囊从气管中拔出。该装置记录的最大力量随后被标记为该试验的“拔管力”。

结果

当用胶布固定气管导管时,与4种市售气管导管固定器中的3种相比,拔管所需的力量明显更大。只有托马斯气管导管固定器固定气管导管比胶布更好。

结论

尽管在本研究中托马斯气管导管固定器的固定力最大,但胶布是最便宜的,并且比用于固定气管导管的其他3种市售装置表现更好。

相似文献

1
Extubation force: tape versus endotracheal tube holders.拔管力度:胶布固定与气管插管固定器的比较
Ann Emerg Med. 2007 Dec;50(6):686-91. doi: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2007.05.013. Epub 2007 Jun 27.
2
Extubation force: a comparison of adhesive tape, non-adhesive tape and a commercial endotracheal tube holder.拔管力:胶带、无胶带和一种商业型气管导管固定器的比较。
Resuscitation. 2009 Nov;80(11):1296-300. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.08.007. Epub 2009 Sep 1.
3
Endotracheal tube extubation force: adhesive tape versus endotracheal tube holder.气管插管拔出力:胶带与气管插管固定器。
Respir Care. 2011 Nov;56(11):1825-9. doi: 10.4187/respcare.00954. Epub 2011 May 20.
4
A Comparison of the Haider Tube-Guard® Endotracheal Tube Holder Versus Adhesive Tape to Determine if This Novel Device Can Reduce Endotracheal Tube Movement and Prevent Unplanned Extubation.比较海德尔气管导管固定器(Haider Tube-Guard®)与胶布,以确定这种新型装置是否能减少气管导管移动并防止意外拔管。
Anesth Analg. 2016 May;122(5):1439-43. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001222.
5
[Comparative study of oral tracheal tube extubation force in a baby manikin model: taping methods and tube diameters].[婴儿人体模型中口腔气管导管拔管力的比较研究:固定方法和导管直径]
Masui. 2011 Aug;60(8):982-4.
6
Endotracheal tube fixation methods for optimal stability: a comparison of adhesive tape, suture, and tape-suture fixation.实现最佳稳定性的气管内导管固定方法:胶布、缝线及胶布-缝线固定法的比较
J Craniofac Surg. 2010 Jul;21(4):1250-1. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3181e20860.
7
A comparison of four endotracheal tube holders.
Heart Lung. 1994 Jan-Feb;23(1):59-66.
8
A comparison of tape-tying versus a tube-holding device for securing endotracheal tubes in adults.成人气管内导管固定用胶布粘贴与持管装置的比较
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2007 Oct;35(5):730-5. doi: 10.1177/0310057X0703500512.
9
Shifts in endotracheal tube position due to chest compressions: a simulation comparison by fixation method.胸部按压导致气管内导管位置的变化:固定方法的模拟比较
J Emerg Med. 2015 Feb;48(2):241-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2014.06.064. Epub 2014 Oct 29.
10
Comparison of tube-taping versus a tube-holding device for securing endotracheal tubes in adults undergoing surgery in prone position.在俯卧位接受手术的成人中,比较气管导管胶带与气管导管固定装置用于固定气管内导管的效果。
Acta Anaesthesiol Belg. 2013;64(2):75-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Continuous monitoring of endotracheal tube position with near infrared light.使用近红外光连续监测气管内导管位置。
J Biomed Opt. 2024 Mar;29(3):035001. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.29.3.035001. Epub 2024 Mar 12.
2
Real-Time Optical Monitoring of Endotracheal Tube Displacement.实时光学监测气管内导管位移。
Biosensors (Basel). 2020 Nov 12;10(11):174. doi: 10.3390/bios10110174.
3
Comparison of the effectiveness of endotracheal tube holder with the conventional method in a manikin model.在人体模型中气管导管固定器与传统方法有效性的比较。
Turk J Emerg Med. 2020 Oct 7;20(4):175-179. doi: 10.4103/2452-2473.297470. eCollection 2020 Oct-Dec.
4
Two Different Endotracheal Tube Securing Techniques: Fixing Bandage vs. Adhesive Tape.两种不同的气管插管固定技术:固定绷带与胶带。
Adv J Emerg Med. 2017 Oct 13;1(1):e3. doi: 10.22114/AJEM.v1i1.6. eCollection 2017 Fall.
5
The effect of adhesive tape versus endotracheal tube fastener in critically ill adults: the endotracheal tube securement (ETTS) randomized controlled trial.胶带与气管内导管固定器对危重症成人的影响:气管内导管固定(ETTS)随机对照试验。
Crit Care. 2019 May 7;23(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s13054-019-2440-7.
6
Unplanned Extubations in Intensive Care Unit: evidences for risk factors. A literature review.重症监护病房中的非计划拔管:风险因素的证据。文献综述。
Acta Biomed. 2017 Nov 30;88(5S):55-65. doi: 10.23750/abm.v88i5-S.6869.
7
Ivy Loop Wiring: A Useful Form of Endotracheal Tube Stabilization in Burn Patients.常春藤环扎布线:烧伤患者气管插管固定的一种有效方式。
Plast Surg (Oakv). 2017 Aug;25(3):175-178. doi: 10.1177/2292550317716123. Epub 2017 Jul 25.
8
A novel technique for securing supra-glottic airway device to prevent mal-positioning.一种用于固定声门上气道装置以防止位置不当的新技术。
Indian J Anaesth. 2016 Jul;60(7):521-2. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.186013.
9
A Comparison of the Haider Tube-Guard® Endotracheal Tube Holder Versus Adhesive Tape to Determine if This Novel Device Can Reduce Endotracheal Tube Movement and Prevent Unplanned Extubation.比较海德尔气管导管固定器(Haider Tube-Guard®)与胶布,以确定这种新型装置是否能减少气管导管移动并防止意外拔管。
Anesth Analg. 2016 May;122(5):1439-43. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001222.
10
Extubation force depends upon angle of force application and fixation technique: a study of 7 methods.拔管力取决于力的施加角度和固定技术:七种方法的研究
BMC Anesthesiol. 2014 Aug 24;14:74. doi: 10.1186/1471-2253-14-74. eCollection 2014.