Suppr超能文献

计算机化医师医嘱录入环境下药学验证的影响。

Impact of pharmacy validation in a computerized physician order entry context.

作者信息

Estellat Candice, Colombet Isabelle, Vautier Sarah, Huault-Quentel Julie, Durieux Pierre, Sabatier Brigitte

机构信息

DEpartement d'Informatique Hospitalière, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, 20-40 rue Leblanc, 75908 Paris cedex 15, France.

出版信息

Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Oct;19(5):317-25. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm025. Epub 2007 Jun 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Computerised physician order entry offers a potential means of reducing prescribing errors, and can also increase the feasibility of pharmacy validation as a secondary filter for eliminating errors. The impacts of these two benefits have never been evaluated in combination.

OBJECTIVE

To describe (i) the pharmacists' interventions during validation of drug prescriptions on a computerized physician order entry system, (ii) the impact of these interventions on the prescribing process and (iii) the extent to which computerized physician order entry was responsible for the identified errors.

METHOD

Prospective collection of all medication order lines during five days in a tertiary care university hospital using computerized physician order entry for drug prescription. All orders were reviewed by a pharmacist. We described the frequency of pharmacy alerts and their short-term impact on the correction of potential prescribing errors (modification of the prescription). An independent committee reviewed their type and link with the computerized physician order entry system.

RESULTS

About 399 (11%) prescription order lines, corresponding to 222 (52%) patients, required a pharmacy alert during the study period. Among the 81 pharmacy alerts targeted to the prescriber, 21 [26% (IC95% = 17-37%)] resulted in a modification of the prescription. Among the 95 potential prescribing error, the independent review committee judged 16 (17%) as potentially life-threatening and attributed 47 (49%) to the use of computerized physician order entry system (unit error, no use of typical order prespecified, prescription inconsistency or other).

CONCLUSION

Pharmacy validation produced only a moderate short-term impact on the reduction of potential prescribing errors. However, pharmacy validation may also provide ongoing benefits by identifying necessary improvements in the computerized physician order entry system. Those improvements would allow pharmacists to concentrate on the most relevant interventions.

摘要

背景

计算机化医师医嘱录入提供了一种减少处方错误的潜在方法,并且还可以增加药房验证作为消除错误的二级过滤器的可行性。这两种益处的影响从未被综合评估过。

目的

描述(i)药剂师在计算机化医师医嘱录入系统上验证药物处方期间的干预措施,(ii)这些干预措施对处方过程的影响,以及(iii)计算机化医师医嘱录入对已识别错误的责任程度。

方法

在一家三级护理大学医院前瞻性收集连续五天使用计算机化医师医嘱录入开具的所有药物医嘱行。所有医嘱均由一名药剂师进行审核。我们描述了药房警示的频率及其对潜在处方错误纠正(处方修改)的短期影响。一个独立委员会审查了它们的类型以及与计算机化医师医嘱录入系统的关联。

结果

在研究期间,约399条(11%)处方医嘱行,对应222名(52%)患者,需要药房警示。在针对开处方者的81条药房警示中,21条[26%(95%置信区间 = 17 - 37%)]导致了处方修改。在95个潜在处方错误中,独立审查委员会判定16个(17%)为潜在危及生命的错误,并将47个(49%)归因于计算机化医师医嘱录入系统的使用(单位错误、未使用预先指定的典型医嘱、处方不一致或其他)。

结论

药房验证对减少潜在处方错误仅产生了适度的短期影响。然而,药房验证还可能通过识别计算机化医师医嘱录入系统中必要的改进而持续带来益处。这些改进将使药剂师能够专注于最相关的干预措施。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验