Moumjid Nora, Brémond Alain, Mignotte Hervé, Faure Christelle, Meunier Anne, Carrère Marie-Odile
GRESAC, GATE (UMR 5824) -CNRS, Lyon 2 University, Lyon 1 University, ENS LSH, Lyon, France.
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2007;101(4):223-8. doi: 10.1016/j.zgesun.2007.02.042.
In France, patients' claim for information and participation to medical decision-making was initiated in the eighties by AIDS associations, then reinforced by the tainted blood scandal and more recently by demands from cancer patients. The right to patient information was recognised on March 4th 2002 by the law pertaining to patients' rights and the quality of the healthcare system. The present article will explore this background by examining the bases, the current status and the development of shared decision-making in the physician-patient encounter in France. We will describe the evolution of the physician-patient relationship on the basis of legal and administrative documents, then show that patients' information, and more generally healthcare users' information, is a central concern for some national health institutions. Finally, we will demonstrate that even if the literature on shared decision-making is little developed in France as compared to other European countries, Northern America and Australia, some studies have nonetheless been conducted. Their results, combined with a legal context and national health institutions encouraging shared decision-making, should prompt otherwise reluctant healthcare professionals to implement this approach in everyday medical practice.