Légaré France, Stacey Dawn, Forest Pierre-Gerlier
Department of Family Medicine, Université Laval, Québec, Canada.
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2007;101(4):213-21. doi: 10.1016/j.zgesun.2007.02.024.
There is considerable interest for shared decision-making (SDM) within the Canadian healthcare system. The current state of SDM in Canada and challenges with implementation are addressed in the paper at three levels of patient involvement: (1) healthcare system (macro-level); (2) institutions (meso-level) and (3) clinical/medical encounter (micro-level). The legal obligation for doctors to fully disclose information enabling patients' participation in decisions has spawned professional codes and guidelines with a vision of patient's empowerment through the use of patient decision aid and SDM. Nevertheless, a survey of general practitioners in 2002 indicated that they perceived their role as relieving anxiety induced in patients rather than engaging them in informed decision-making. The virtue of SDM has gained recognition through increased research funding, medical training and some initiatives embedding patient decision aids within the process of care. Future perspectives of SDM in Canada are highlighted such as evaluation of the long-term impact of and costs associated with patient participation in decisions as well as interprofessional approaches to SDM.
加拿大医疗保健系统对共同决策(SDM)有着浓厚兴趣。本文从患者参与的三个层面探讨了加拿大共同决策的现状及实施过程中面临的挑战:(1)医疗保健系统(宏观层面);(2)机构(中观层面);(3)临床/医疗接触(微观层面)。医生有充分披露信息以使患者参与决策的法律义务,这催生了专业准则和指南,其目标是通过使用患者决策辅助工具和共同决策来增强患者权能。尽管如此,2002年对全科医生的一项调查表明,他们认为自己的角色是缓解患者的焦虑,而非让患者参与知情决策。通过增加研究资金、医学培训以及一些将患者决策辅助工具纳入护理过程的举措,共同决策的优势已得到认可。文中还强调了加拿大共同决策的未来展望,例如评估患者参与决策的长期影响和相关成本,以及共同决策的跨专业方法。