• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

由妇产科住院医师培训项目实施的在线面试安排程序的受邀申请者评估。

Invited applicant evaluation of an online interview scheduler implemented by a residency program in obstetrics and gynecology.

作者信息

Metheny William P

机构信息

Women and Infants Hospital, Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02905, USA.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Jul;110(1):109-12. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000266978.58166.7c.

DOI:10.1097/01.AOG.0000266978.58166.7c
PMID:17601904
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess invited resident applicants' views of the feasibility and acceptability of a point-and-click online interview scheduler.

METHODS

An online program was created for invited applicants to schedule themselves. The program presented the invitees with a series of interview dates with available slots for which they could click and receive immediate confirmation of their selected date. The majority of the invitees were asked to schedule online. These invitees received a brief survey to assess their views of the online scheduler.

RESULTS

Eighty-three applicants were invited by e-mail for a resident interview, 71 of whom were offered the online scheduler. Of these 100% booked themselves online within 3-4 days of invitation. After three e-mail reminders 100% of the invitees completed the survey. Sixty-five of the 71 (92%, 95% confidence interval [CI] 85.4-98.6) said they liked the scheduling program, and most (77%, 95% CI 67.2-86.8) preferred to book online rather than telephone or e-mail. Eighty percent (95% CI 70.7-89.3) found the online scheduler easier to use. Overall, 72% (95% CI 60.5-81.6) felt that having an on-line scheduler did not affect their opinion of the quality of the program. Invitees in favor of the scheduler liked the convenience of anytime scheduling, the immediate confirmation, a quick view of available dates and times, and the ability to schedule without depending on someone else.

CONCLUSION

Our online scheduler proved to be easy to use, eliminated phone calls with applicants, and satisfied most of the invitees.

摘要

目的

评估受邀住院医师申请人对点击式在线面试安排程序的可行性和可接受性的看法。

方法

创建了一个在线程序供受邀申请人自行安排面试时间。该程序向受邀者展示一系列带有可用时间段的面试日期,他们可以点击并立即获得所选日期的确认。大多数受邀者被要求在线安排时间。这些受邀者接受了一项简短调查,以评估他们对在线安排程序的看法。

结果

通过电子邮件邀请了83名申请人参加住院医师面试,其中71人获得了在线安排程序。在这71人中,100%在收到邀请后的3 - 4天内自行在线预约。经过三次电子邮件提醒后,100%的受邀者完成了调查。71人中有65人(92%,95%置信区间[CI]85.4 - 98.6)表示喜欢该安排程序,大多数人(77%,95%CI 67.2 - 86.8)更喜欢在线预约而不是通过电话或电子邮件。80%(95%CI 70.7 - 89.3)的人认为在线安排程序更易于使用。总体而言,72%(95%CI 60.5 - 81.6)的人认为有在线安排程序不会影响他们对该项目质量的看法。支持该安排程序的受邀者喜欢随时安排的便利性、即时确认、快速查看可用日期和时间以及无需依赖他人即可安排时间的能力。

结论

我们的在线安排程序证明易于使用,消除了与申请人的电话沟通,并使大多数受邀者感到满意。

相似文献

1
Invited applicant evaluation of an online interview scheduler implemented by a residency program in obstetrics and gynecology.由妇产科住院医师培训项目实施的在线面试安排程序的受邀申请者评估。
Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Jul;110(1):109-12. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000266978.58166.7c.
2
Use and utility of Web-based residency program information: a survey of residency applicants.基于网络的住院医师培训项目信息的使用与效用:住院医师申请人调查
J Med Internet Res. 2003 Jul-Sep;5(3):e22. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5.3.e22. Epub 2003 Sep 25.
3
Computerized Residency Interview Scheduling: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Categorical General Surgery Applicants.计算机化住院医师面试安排:对普通外科分类申请人的随机对照试验。
J Surg Educ. 2019 Jan-Feb;76(1):36-42. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2018.06.001. Epub 2018 Jul 17.
4
Emergency medicine residency applicant perceptions of unethical recruiting practices and illegal questioning in the match.急诊医学住院医师培训项目申请人对配对过程中不道德招募行为和非法提问的看法。
Acad Emerg Med. 2009 Jun;16(6):550-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1553-2712.2009.00413.x. Epub 2009 Apr 21.
5
Residency applicants prefer online system for scheduling interviews.住院医师项目申请人更喜欢通过在线系统安排面试。
West J Emerg Med. 2015 Mar;16(2):352-4. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2015.1.24615. Epub 2015 Mar 6.
6
Aspects of residency programs' web sites important to student applicants.住院医师培训项目网站中对学生申请者重要的方面。
Acad Emerg Med. 2005 Jan;12(1):89-92. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2004.08.047.
7
Comparison of web-based and face-to-face interviews for application to an anesthesiology training program: a pilot study.基于网络的面试与面对面面试在麻醉学培训项目申请中的比较:一项试点研究。
Int J Med Educ. 2016 Apr 3;7:102-8. doi: 10.5116/ijme.56e5.491a.
8
The impact of a rural emergency department rotation on applicant ranking of a US emergency medicine residency program.农村急诊科轮转对美国急诊医学住院医师培训项目申请人排名的影响。
Rural Remote Health. 2007 Oct-Dec;7(4):686. Epub 2007 Nov 29.
9
Importance of residency program web sites to emergency medicine applicants.住院医师培训项目网站对急诊医学申请者的重要性。
J Emerg Med. 2009 Jan;36(1):83-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2007.10.055. Epub 2008 Apr 24.
10
Characteristics of the residency interview process preferred by medical student applicants.医学生申请者偏好的住院医师面试流程特点。
J Fam Pract. 1982 Oct;15(4):669-72.

引用本文的文献

1
A Challenge to Disrupt the Disruptive Process of Residency Interview Invitations.对扰乱住院医师面试邀请的颠覆性过程的一项挑战。
J Grad Med Educ. 2019 Aug;11(4):375-377. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-19-00080.1.
2
Residency Applicant Preferences of Online Systems for Scheduling Interviews.住院医师申请人对面试安排在线系统的偏好
J Grad Med Educ. 2016 Dec;8(5):759-762. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-16-00072.1.
3
Residency applicants prefer online system for scheduling interviews.住院医师项目申请人更喜欢通过在线系统安排面试。
West J Emerg Med. 2015 Mar;16(2):352-4. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2015.1.24615. Epub 2015 Mar 6.