• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国妇产科医师学会委员会意见。第371号。2007年7月。女性绝育,包括有精神残疾的女性。

ACOG Committee Opinion. Number 371. July 2007. Sterilization of women, including those with mental disabilities.

出版信息

Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Jul;110(1):217-20. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000263915.70071.29.

DOI:10.1097/01.AOG.0000263915.70071.29
PMID:17601925
Abstract

Sterilization, like any other surgical procedure, must be carried out under the general ethical principles of respect for autonomy, beneficence, and justice. Women requesting sterilization should be encouraged to discuss their decision and associated issues with their husbands or other appropriate intimate partners. The physician who objects to a patient's request for sterilization solely as a matter of conscience has the obligation to inform the patient that sterilization services may be available elsewhere and should refer the patient to another caregiver. The presence of mental capacity does not, in itself, justify either sterilization or its denial. When a patient's mental capacity is limited and sterilization is considered, the physician must consult with the patient's family, agents, and other caregivers in an effort to adopt a plan that protects what the consulted group believes to be the patient's best interests while, at the same time, preserving, to the maximum extent possible, the patient's autonomy.

摘要

绝育手术与其他任何外科手术一样,必须在尊重自主、行善和公正等一般伦理原则下进行。应鼓励要求绝育的女性与丈夫或其他合适的亲密伴侣讨论其决定及相关问题。仅因良心问题而反对患者绝育请求的医生有义务告知患者其他地方可能提供绝育服务,并应将患者转介给其他医护人员。具备心智能力本身并不足以成为进行绝育或拒绝绝育的理由。当患者心智能力有限且考虑进行绝育时,医生必须与患者的家人、代理人及其他医护人员协商,以制定一项既能保护被咨询群体认为符合患者最佳利益的方案,同时又能在最大程度上维护患者自主权的计划。

相似文献

1
ACOG Committee Opinion. Number 371. July 2007. Sterilization of women, including those with mental disabilities.美国妇产科医师学会委员会意见。第371号。2007年7月。女性绝育,包括有精神残疾的女性。
Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Jul;110(1):217-20. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000263915.70071.29.
2
Involuntary sterilization of persons with mental retardation: an ethical analysis.对智障人士的非自愿绝育:一项伦理分析。
Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2003;9(1):21-6. doi: 10.1002/mrdd.10053.
3
Nonconsensual sterilization of the mentally disabled in North Carolina: an ethics critique of the statutory standard and its judicial interpretation.
J Contemp Health Law Policy. 1996 Fall;13(1):79-111.
4
Reproduction, ethics, and public policy: the federal sterilization regulations.生殖、伦理与公共政策:联邦绝育法规
Hastings Cent Rep. 1979 Oct;9(5):29-41.
5
The international medicolegal status of sterilization for mentally handicapped people.智障人士绝育的国际法医学地位。
J Reprod Med. 1982 May;27(5):257-8.
6
Sterilization of women who are mentally handicapped. ACOG Committee Opinion No. 63.
ACOG Comm Opin. 1988 Sep;No. 63:3 p.
7
ACOG Committee Opinion No. 363: patient testing: ethical issues in selection and counseling.
Obstet Gynecol. 2007 Apr;109(4):1021-3. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000263889.07297.d1.
8
ACOG committee opinion. Sterilization of women, including those with mental disabilities. Number 216, April 1999 (replaces number 63, September 1988, and number 73, September 1989). Committee on Ethics. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1999 Jun;65(3):317-20.
9
Sterilization of the mentally disabled.对精神残疾人的绝育
CMAJ. 1986 Jun 15;134(12):1390-6.
10
Permanent sterilization of mentally disabled individuals: a case study.
Surgery. 2009 Nov;146(5):959-63. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2009.09.004.

引用本文的文献

1
Navigating Complexities: Social, Ethical & Medicolegal Dilemmas of Hysterectomy in Young, Unmarried Women with Disabilities.
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2025 Feb;75(1):89-91. doi: 10.1007/s13224-024-02043-y. Epub 2024 Aug 31.
2
Rethinking systemic ableism: A response to Zagouras, Ellick, and Aulisio.重新思考系统性能力歧视:对扎古拉斯、埃利克和奥利索的回应。
Clin Ethics. 2023 Mar;18(1):7-12. doi: 10.1177/14777509221094472. Epub 2022 Apr 20.
3
Ethics of a Mandatory Waiting Period for Female Sterilization.女性绝育强制等待期的伦理问题。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2022 Jul;52(4):17-25. doi: 10.1002/hast.1405.
4
Contraceptive Practices and Reproductive Health Considerations for Adolescent and Adult Women with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities: A Review of the Literature.智力和发育障碍的青少年及成年女性的避孕措施与生殖健康考量:文献综述
Sex Disabil. 2019 Oct;37(4):541-557. doi: 10.1007/s11195-019-09600-8.
5
Hysterectomy and disability among U.S. women.美国女性的子宫切除术和残疾。
Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2013 Sep;45(3):157-63. doi: 10.1363/4515713. Epub 2013 Aug 2.
6
Socioeconomic disparities in ectopic pregnancy: predictors of adverse outcomes from Illinois hospital-based care, 2000-2006.社会经济差异与宫外孕:伊利诺伊州基于医院的护理中不良结局的预测因素,2000-2006 年。
Matern Child Health J. 2011 Feb;15(2):234-41. doi: 10.1007/s10995-010-0579-6.
7
"Everything I know I learned from my mother...Or not": perspectives of African-American and white women on decisions about tubal sterilization.“我所知道的一切都是从母亲那里学到的……或者并非如此”:非裔美国女性和白人女性对输卵管绝育决策的看法
J Gen Intern Med. 2009 Mar;24(3):312-9. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0887-3. Epub 2008 Dec 19.
8
The impact of race and ethnicity on receipt of family planning services in the United States.种族和族裔对美国计划生育服务获取情况的影响。
J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2009 Jan-Feb;18(1):91-6. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2008.0976.