Gilhooly M, Hanlon P, Cullen B, Macdonald S, Whyte B
School of Health Sciences and Social Care, Brunel University, Mary Seacole Building, Uxbridge UB8 3PH, UK.
Public Health. 2007 Nov;121(11):814-21. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2007.03.003. Epub 2007 Jul 2.
This paper presents further analysis of a study aimed at examining the determinants of good health and successful ageing in an area of deprivation. In this paper we report findings from the quantitative data related to two of the original eight research questions: (1) To what extent can health in old age be attributed to psychological/personality variables? and (2) What is the role of religious beliefs and 'spirituality' in healthy ageing?
In-depth interview study in which standardized measures of personality and beliefs were administered, along with measures of beliefs devised for the study.
One hundred matched pairs of healthy and unhealthy 'agers' were interviewed face-to-face. Healthy ageing was assessed in terms of hospital morbidity and self-reported health. The sample comprised 106 males and 94 females (53 male matched pairs and 47 female matched pairs) ranging in age from 70 to 90 years of age with the majority (n=165) falling into the 71-80 age group and the remaining 35 in the 81-90 age group. All study participants were survivors of the Paisley/Renfrew (MIDSPAN) survey, a longitudinal study commenced in 1972 with continuous recording of morbidity and mortality since. Questionnaires assessing extraversion, neuroticism, psychoticism, health locus of control, sense of coherence, optimism, and religiosity were filled in by participants during the interviews.
Compared to the unhealthy group, the healthy participants were less neurotic, more likely to endorse an internal locus of control belief and less likely to endorse a powerful others locus of control belief, and to report a greater sense of coherence. The unhealthy group scored higher on the religiosity/spirituality measure devised for this study.
The findings are interesting in that, although they cannot address the issue of cause and effect, the very fact that the personality traits measured in this study were linked to health status in old age, further strengthens the argument that in general practice and hospital settings, an understanding of personality aids practitioners in dealing with patients. Finally, with the growing body of evidence that personality traits have a high degree of heritability, the routine gathering of information on personality traits would aid epidemiologists in their understanding of the determinants of healthy and successful ageing.
本文对一项旨在研究贫困地区健康状况良好和成功老龄化的决定因素的研究进行了进一步分析。在本文中,我们报告了与最初八个研究问题中的两个相关的定量数据结果:(1)老年健康在多大程度上可归因于心理/人格变量?(2)宗教信仰和“精神性”在健康老龄化中起什么作用?
深入访谈研究,采用了人格和信仰的标准化测量方法,以及为本研究设计的信仰测量方法。
对100对匹配的健康和不健康“老年人”进行面对面访谈。根据医院发病率和自我报告的健康状况评估健康老龄化情况。样本包括106名男性和94名女性(53对男性匹配组和47对女性匹配组),年龄在70至90岁之间,大多数(n = 165)属于71 - 80岁年龄组,其余35人属于81 - 90岁年龄组。所有研究参与者都是佩斯利/伦弗鲁(MIDSPAN)调查的幸存者,该纵向研究始于1972年,此后持续记录发病率和死亡率。参与者在访谈期间填写了评估外向性、神经质、精神质、健康控制点、连贯感、乐观主义和宗教信仰的问卷。
与不健康组相比,健康参与者神经质程度较低,更倾向于认同内控信念,不太可能认同他人强大的控制点信念,并且报告有更强的连贯感。在为本研究设计的宗教信仰/精神性测量中,不健康组得分更高。
这些发现很有意思,因为尽管它们无法解决因果关系问题,但本研究中测量的人格特质与老年健康状况相关这一事实,进一步强化了这样的观点,即在一般实践和医院环境中,了解人格有助于从业者治疗患者。最后,随着越来越多的证据表明人格特质具有高度遗传性,常规收集人格特质信息将有助于流行病学家理解健康和成功老龄化的决定因素。