Why the MRC randomized trials of whooping cough (pertussis) vaccines remain important more than half a century after they were done.
作者信息
Jefferson T
出版信息
J R Soc Med. 2007 Jul;100(7):343-5. doi: 10.1177/014107680710000720.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Why the MRC randomized trials of whooping cough (pertussis) vaccines remain important more than half a century after they were done.为什么医学研究委员会（MRC）关于百日咳疫苗的随机试验在完成半个多世纪后仍然很重要。
J R Soc Med. 2007 Jul;100(7):343-5. doi: 10.1177/014107680710000720.
2
Joseph Asbury Bell and the birth of randomized trials.约瑟夫·阿斯伯里·贝尔与随机试验的诞生。
J R Soc Med. 2007 Jun;100(6):287-93. doi: 10.1177/014107680710000616.
3
Whooping cough: how the west was won.百日咳：西方是如何战胜它的。
Nurs Times. 1999;95(40):52-4.
4
[Why was whooping cough vaccination in Sweden interrupted between 1979-1996?].[1979年至1996年间瑞典的百日咳疫苗接种为何中断？]
Lakartidningen. 2005;102(39):2788.
5
Whooping cough immunization.百日咳免疫接种
Med J Aust. 1979 Dec 15;2(12):651. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.1979.tb127257.x.
6
The Kendrick-Eldering-(Frost) pertussis vaccine field trial.肯德里克-埃尔德林（-弗罗斯特）百日咳疫苗现场试验。
J R Soc Med. 2007 May;100(5):242-7. doi: 10.1177/014107680710000516.
7
The true story of pertussis vaccination: a sordid legacy?百日咳疫苗接种的真实故事：一段不堪的遗产？
J Hist Med Allied Sci. 2002 Jul;57(3):249-84. doi: 10.1093/jhmas/57.3.249.
8
History of the development of pertussis vaccine.
Dev Biol Stand. 1991;73:13-29.
9
Pertussis: 100-day Disease Over 50 Years!百日咳：50多年来的百日疾病！
Indian Pediatr. 2019 Oct 15;56(10):865-867.
10
[Whooping cough and pertussis vaccination. Report in commemoration of the 40th anniversary of pertussis vaccination in Mexico, 13 June 1940].[百日咳与百日咳疫苗接种。纪念墨西哥百日咳疫苗接种40周年报告，1940年6月13日]
Salud Publica Mex. 1982 Jul-Aug;24(4):399-465.
引用本文的文献
1
The Medical Research Council and clinical trial methodologies before the 1940s: the failure to develop a 'scientific' approach.医学研究委员会与20世纪40年代之前的临床试验方法：未能形成一种“科学”方法。
J R Soc Med. 2011 Aug;104(8):335-43. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2011.11k021.
本文引用的文献
1
Trial of Whooping-cough Vaccine.百日咳疫苗试验
Br Med J. 1945 Aug 18;2(4415):205-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.2.4415.205.
2
Comparison of pertussis cultures by mouse protection and virulence tests .通过小鼠保护试验和毒力试验对百日咳培养物进行比较。
Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1949 Feb;39(2):179-84. doi: 10.2105/ajph.39.2.179.
3
Use of Alum-Treated Pertussis Vaccine, and of Alum-Precipitated Combined Pertussis Vaccine and Diphtheria Toxoid, for Active Immunization.明矾处理的百日咳疫苗以及明矾沉淀的百日咳疫苗与白喉类毒素联合疫苗用于主动免疫
Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1942 Jun;32(6):615-26. doi: 10.2105/ajph.32.6.615.
4
Active Immunization Against Whooping Cough : Interim Report of the Cleveland Experience.百日咳主动免疫：克利夫兰经验的中期报告。
Am J Public Health Nations Health. 1936 Nov;26(11):1097-105. doi: 10.2105/ajph.26.11.1097.
5
Joseph Asbury Bell and the birth of randomized trials.约瑟夫·阿斯伯里·贝尔与随机试验的诞生。
J R Soc Med. 2007 Jun;100(6):287-93. doi: 10.1177/014107680710000616.
6
Whooping cough in school age children with persistent cough: prospective cohort study in primary care.学龄期持续性咳嗽儿童的百日咳：初级保健中的前瞻性队列研究
BMJ. 2006 Jul 22;333(7560):174-7. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38870.655405.AE. Epub 2006 Jul 7.
7
PREVENTION of whooping-cough by vaccination; a Medical Research Council investigation.通过接种疫苗预防百日咳；医学研究委员会的一项调查
Br Med J. 1951 Jun 30;1(4721):1463-71.
8
9
Systematic review of the effects of pertussis vaccines in children.百日咳疫苗对儿童影响的系统评价
Vaccine. 2003 May 16;21(17-18):2003-14. doi: 10.1016/s0264-410x(02)00770-3.
10
Reflections on the efficacy of pertussis vaccines.关于百日咳疫苗效力的思考
Rev Infect Dis. 1987 Sep-Oct;9(5):866-83. doi: 10.1093/clinids/9.5.866.
Zotero 插件