Suppr超能文献

没有替代决策者的患者的生命支持:由谁来决定?

Life support for patients without a surrogate decision maker: who decides?

作者信息

White Douglas B, Curtis J Randall, Wolf Leslie E, Prendergast Thomas J, Taichman Darren B, Kuniyoshi Gary, Acerra Frank, Lo Bernard, Luce John M

机构信息

University of California, San Francisco, and San Francisco General Hospital, San Francisco, California 94143-0903, USA.

出版信息

Ann Intern Med. 2007 Jul 3;147(1):34-40. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-1-200707030-00006.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Physicians in intensive care units have withdrawn life support in incapacitated patients who lack surrogate decision makers and advance directives, yet little is known about how often this occurs or under what circumstances.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the proportion of deaths in intensive care units that occur in patients who lack decision-making capacity and a surrogate and the process that physicians use to make these decisions.

DESIGN

Multicenter, prospective cohort study.

SETTING

Intensive care units of 7 medical centers in 2004 to 2005.

PATIENTS

3011 consecutive critically ill adults.

MEASUREMENTS

Attending physicians completed a questionnaire about the decision-making process for each incapacitated patient without a surrogate or advance directive for whom they considered limiting life support.

RESULTS

Overall, 5.5% (25 of 451 patients) of deaths in intensive care units occurred in incapacitated patients who lacked a surrogate decision maker and an advance directive. This percentage ranged from 0% to 27% across the 7 centers. Physicians considered limiting life support in 37 such patients or would have considered it if a surrogate had been available. In 6 patients, there was prospective hospital review of the decision, and in 1 patient, there was court review. In the remaining 30 patients, the decision was made by the intensive care unit team alone or by the intensive care unit team plus another attending physician. The authors found wide variability in hospital policies, professional society guidelines, and state laws regarding who should make life-support decisions for this patient population. Thirty-six of 37 life-support decisions were made in a manner inconsistent with American College of Physicians guidelines for judicial review.

LIMITATIONS

The results are based on physicians' self-reported practices and may not match actual practices. The number of incapacitated patients without surrogates in the study is small.

CONCLUSIONS

Incapacitated patients without surrogates accounted for approximately 1 in 20 deaths in intensive care units. Most life-support decisions were made by physicians without institutional or judicial review.

摘要

背景

重症监护病房的医生已对缺乏替代决策者和预先指示的无行为能力患者撤除生命支持,但对于这种情况发生的频率或在何种情况下发生知之甚少。

目的

确定重症监护病房中在缺乏决策能力且无替代者的患者中发生的死亡比例,以及医生做出这些决策所采用的过程。

设计

多中心前瞻性队列研究。

地点

2004年至2005年7家医疗中心的重症监护病房。

患者

3011例连续入住的重症成年患者。

测量

主治医生针对每位无行为能力、无替代者且无预先指示、其考虑限制生命支持的患者,填写一份关于决策过程的问卷。

结果

总体而言,重症监护病房中5.5%(451例患者中的25例)的死亡发生在缺乏替代决策者和预先指示的无行为能力患者中。这一比例在7个中心之间从0%到27%不等。医生考虑对37例此类患者限制生命支持,或者如果有替代者则会考虑限制生命支持。6例患者的决策经过了医院前瞻性审查,1例患者的决策经过了法院审查。在其余30例患者中,决策由重症监护病房团队单独做出,或由重症监护病房团队加另一位主治医生做出。作者发现,关于应由谁为这类患者做出生命支持决策,医院政策、专业协会指南和州法律存在很大差异。37项生命支持决策中有36项的做出方式不符合美国医师学会关于司法审查的指南。

局限性

结果基于医生自我报告的做法,可能与实际做法不符。研究中无替代者的无行为能力患者数量较少。

结论

无替代者的无行为能力患者约占重症监护病房死亡人数的二十分之一。大多数生命支持决策由医生做出,未经过机构或司法审查。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验