White Douglas B, Evans Leah R, Bautista Christopher A, Luce John M, Lo Bernard
Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009 Aug 15;180(4):320-5. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200811-1776OC. Epub 2009 Jun 4.
Although there is a growing belief that physicians should routinely provide a recommendation to surrogates during deliberations about withdrawing life support, there is a paucity of empirical data on surrogates' perspectives on this topic.
To understand the attitudes of surrogate decision-makers toward receiving a physician's recommendation during deliberations about whether to limit life support for an incapacitated patient.
We conducted a prospective, mixed methods study among 169 surrogate decision-makers for critically ill patients. Surrogates sequentially viewed two videos of simulated physician-surrogate discussions about whether to limit life support, which varied only by whether the physician gave a recommendation.
The main quantitative outcome was whether surrogates preferred to receive a physicians' recommendation. Surrogates also participated in an in-depth, semistructured interview to explore the reasons for their preference. Fifty-six percent (95/169) of surrogates preferred to receive a recommendation, 42% (70/169) preferred not to receive a recommendation, and 2% (4/169) felt that both approaches were equally acceptable. We identified four main themes that explained surrogates' preferences, including surrogates' perceptions of physicians' appropriate role in life or death decisions and their perceptions of the positive or negative consequences of a recommendation on the physician-surrogate relationship, on the decision-making process, and on long-term regret for the family.
There is no consensus among surrogates about whether physicians should routinely provide a recommendation regarding life support decisions for incapacitated patients. These findings suggest that physicians should ask surrogates whether they wish to receive a recommendation regarding life support decisions and should be flexible in their approach to decision-making.
尽管越来越多的人认为医生在关于撤除生命支持的讨论中应常规性地向代理人提供建议,但关于代理人对该主题的看法的实证数据却很少。
了解在就是否限制无行为能力患者的生命支持进行讨论时,替代决策者对接受医生建议的态度。
我们对169名重症患者的替代决策者进行了一项前瞻性的混合方法研究。代理人依次观看两段模拟医生与代理人关于是否限制生命支持的讨论视频,两段视频的区别仅在于医生是否给出了建议。
主要的定量结果是代理人是否更倾向于接受医生的建议。代理人还参与了一次深入的半结构化访谈,以探讨他们偏好的原因。56%(95/169)的代理人更倾向于接受建议,42%(70/169)的代理人更倾向于不接受建议,2%(4/169)的代理人认为两种方式同样可以接受。我们确定了四个主要主题来解释代理人的偏好,包括代理人对医生在生死决策中适当角色的看法,以及他们对建议对医患关系、决策过程和家庭长期遗憾的积极或消极后果的看法。
在医生是否应常规性地就无行为能力患者的生命支持决策提供建议这一问题上,代理人之间没有达成共识。这些发现表明,医生应该询问代理人是否希望就生命支持决策接受建议,并且在决策方法上应保持灵活。