Suppr超能文献

用于诊断马鼻疽的孟加拉玫瑰红平板凝集试验、鼻疽菌素试验及一些传统血清学试验的比较评估

Comparative evaluation of Rose Bengal plate agglutination test, mallein test, and some conventional serological tests for diagnosis of equine glanders.

作者信息

Naureen Abeera, Saqib Muhammad, Muhammad Ghulan, Hussain Muhammad H, Asi Muhammad N

机构信息

Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad, 38040 Pakistan.

出版信息

J Vet Diagn Invest. 2007 Jul;19(4):362-7. doi: 10.1177/104063870701900404.

Abstract

The Rose Bengal plate agglutination test (RBT) was evaluated for the diagnosis of equine glanders, and its diagnostic efficiency was compared with that of mallein and other serological tests, including indirect hemagglutination test (IHAT), complement fixation test (CFT), and modified counter immunoelectrophoresis test (mCIET). Sera from 70 naturally infected culture-positive, 96 potentially exposed cohorts, and 110 healthy equines were tested. All tests but mCIET showed 100% specificity when testing the sera from glanders-negative equines. The calculated sensitivities of RBT, IHAT, CFT, mCIET, and mallein test when testing culture-positive equines were 90.0, 97.1, 91.4, 81.4, and 75.7%, respectively. The RBT was significantly (P < 0.05) more sensitive than the mallein test and mCIET. The positive and negative predictive values of each test (RBT, IHAT, CFT, mallein test, and mCIET) were as follows: 100 and 94, 100 and 98.2, 100 and 96.7, 100 and 86.6, and 90.5 and 88.6, respectively. On comparing glandered and nonglandered animals, the highest agreement (0.987) was found between RBT and CFT followed by RBT and IHAT (0.940), RBT and mallein test (0.871), and RBT and mCIET (0.852). Because the RBT is simpler and rapid to perform, the inclusion of the test as a supplementary test for the diagnosis of glanders in field conditions is recommended.

摘要

对玫瑰红平板凝集试验(RBT)用于诊断马鼻疽进行了评估,并将其诊断效率与鼻疽菌素及其他血清学检测方法进行了比较,其他检测方法包括间接血凝试验(IHAT)、补体结合试验(CFT)和改良对流免疫电泳试验(mCIET)。对70匹自然感染且培养阳性、96匹可能暴露群体的马匹以及110匹健康马匹的血清进行了检测。在检测鼻疽阴性马匹的血清时,除mCIET外的所有检测方法特异性均为100%。检测培养阳性马匹时,RBT、IHAT、CFT、mCIET和鼻疽菌素试验的计算敏感性分别为90.0%、97.1%、91.4%、81.4%和75.7%。RBT比鼻疽菌素试验和mCIET显著更敏感(P < 0.05)。每种检测方法(RBT、IHAT、CFT、鼻疽菌素试验和mCIET)的阳性和阴性预测值如下:分别为100和94、100和98.2、100和96.7、100和86.6以及90.5和88.6。在比较患鼻疽和未患鼻疽的动物时,RBT与CFT之间的一致性最高(0.987),其次是RBT与IHAT(0.940)、RBT与鼻疽菌素试验(0.871)以及RBT与mCIET(0.852)。由于RBT操作更简单、快速,建议将该检测方法作为现场条件下诊断鼻疽的补充检测方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验