Suppr超能文献

Policy forum: studying eyewitness investigations in the field.

作者信息

Schacter Daniel L, Dawes Robyn, Jacoby Larry L, Kahneman Daniel, Lempert Richard, Roediger Henry L, Rosenthal Robert

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Harvard University, William James Hall, 33 Kirkland Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.

出版信息

Law Hum Behav. 2008 Feb;32(1):3-5. doi: 10.1007/s10979-007-9093-9. Epub 2007 Jul 4.

Abstract

This article considers methodological issues arising from recent efforts to provide field tests of eyewitness identification procedures. We focus in particular on a field study (Mecklenburg 2006) that examined the "double blind, sequential" technique, and consider the implications of an acknowledged methodological confound in the study. We explain why the confound has severe consequences for assessing the real-world implications of this study.

摘要

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验