Werner Nicole-Simone, Kühnel Sina, Markowitsch Hans J
Physiological Psychology, University of Bielefeld , Bielefeld , Germany.
Front Behav Neurosci. 2013 Dec 6;7:189. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2013.00189.
Humans are experts in face perception. We are better able to distinguish between the differences of faces and their components than between any other kind of objects. Several studies investigating the underlying neural networks provided evidence for deviated face processing in criminal individuals, although results are often confounded by accompanying mental or addiction disorders. On the other hand, face processing in non-criminal healthy persons can be of high juridical interest in cases of witnessing a felony and afterward identifying a culprit. Memory and therefore recognition of a person can be affected by many parameters and thus become distorted. But also face processing itself is modulated by different factors like facial characteristics, degree of familiarity, and emotional relation. These factors make the comparison of different cases, as well as the transfer of laboratory results to real live settings very challenging. Several neuroimaging studies have been published in recent years and some progress was made connecting certain brain activation patterns with the correct recognition of an individual. However, there is still a long way to go before brain imaging can make a reliable contribution to court procedures.
人类是面部感知方面的专家。相较于其他任何种类的物体,我们更善于辨别面部及其组成部分之间的差异。几项针对潜在神经网络的研究为犯罪个体面部处理偏差提供了证据,尽管结果常常因伴随的精神或成瘾障碍而混淆。另一方面,在目睹重罪并随后指认罪犯的案件中,非犯罪健康个体的面部处理可能具有很高的司法价值。记忆以及对一个人的识别会受到许多参数的影响,从而变得扭曲。而且面部处理本身也会受到不同因素的调节,如面部特征、熟悉程度和情感关系。这些因素使得不同案例之间的比较,以及将实验室结果应用于实际场景变得极具挑战性。近年来已经发表了几项神经影像学研究,并且在将某些大脑激活模式与对个体的正确识别联系起来方面取得了一些进展。然而,在脑成像能够对法庭程序做出可靠贡献之前,仍有很长的路要走。