Tiesman Hope, Young Tracy, Torner James C, McMahon Mark, Peek-Asa Corinne, Fiedler John
University of Iowa Injury Prevention Research Center, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
J Neurotrauma. 2007 Jul;24(7):1189-97. doi: 10.1089/neu.2006.0196.
The response of trauma systems in rural areas is uncertain since distances between injury scenes and trauma care are considerable. Timely arrival at definitive care is critical for persons with traumatic brain injury (TBI) since secondary damage can occur during the hours following injury. We evaluated how the implementation of a trauma system in a predominately rural state affected the triage of TBI patients and their risk for mortality. The Iowa System Trauma Registry Dataset was analyzed, and included patients evaluated before trauma system implementation, 1997-1998, and after implementation, 2002-2003. Patients were identified using ICD9-CM codes or AIS codes, and included 710 pre-system patients and 886 post-system patients. Multivariate logistic regression assessed the effect of the trauma system on survival while controlling for confounders. Following implementation of the trauma system, patients treated in Level I or II facilities were older (p = 0.019), more often had multiple injuries (p = 0.0002), and had more severe TBI (p = 0.008). After controlling for confounders, transferred patients and those directly admitted were less likely to die in 72 h in the post-system than the pre-system (odds ratio [OR] = 0.56, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.36, 0.88; OR = 0.50, 95% CI = 0.32, 0.79). Implementation of the Iowa trauma system seems to have led to more appropriate triage and transport for TBI patients, and this likely contributed to reduced in-hospital mortality.
由于农村地区创伤现场与创伤治疗机构之间的距离较远,农村创伤系统的响应情况尚不确定。对于创伤性脑损伤(TBI)患者而言,及时获得确定性治疗至关重要,因为受伤后的数小时内可能会发生继发性损伤。我们评估了在一个以农村为主的州实施创伤系统如何影响TBI患者的分诊及其死亡风险。对爱荷华州系统创伤登记数据集进行了分析,该数据集包括1997 - 1998年创伤系统实施前以及2002 - 2003年实施后评估的患者。使用ICD9 - CM编码或AIS编码识别患者,包括710名系统实施前的患者和886名系统实施后的患者。多变量逻辑回归在控制混杂因素的同时评估了创伤系统对生存的影响。创伤系统实施后,在一级或二级医疗机构接受治疗的患者年龄更大(p = 0.019),更常出现多发伤(p = 0.0002),且TBI更严重(p = 0.008)。在控制混杂因素后,与系统实施前相比,系统实施后转诊患者和直接入院患者在72小时内死亡的可能性更小(比值比[OR] = 0.56,95%置信区间[CI] = 0.36, 0.88;OR = 0.50,95% CI = 0.32, 0.79)。爱荷华州创伤系统的实施似乎使TBI患者得到了更恰当的分诊和转运,这可能有助于降低住院死亡率。