Mercken Liesbeth, Candel Math, Willems Paul, de Vries Hein
Care and Public Heath research Institute, University of Maastricht, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Addiction. 2007 Sep;102(9):1483-92. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2007.01905.x. Epub 2007 Jul 4.
The goal of this study was to examine social selection and social influence within reciprocal and non-reciprocal friendships, and the role of parents and siblings, as factors explaining similarity of smoking behaviour among adolescent friends. A new social selection-social influence model is proposed.
Longitudinal design with two measurements.
Data were gathered among Dutch high school students in the control group of the European Smoking prevention Framework Approach (ESFA) study.
The sample consisted of 1886 adolescents with a mean age of 12.7 years.
The main outcome measures were the smoking behaviours of the respondents, best friends, parents and siblings. We tested the social selection-social influence model with structural equation modelling techniques.
Social selection and social influence both played an important role in explaining similarity of smoking behaviour among friends. Within non-reciprocal friendships, only social selection explained similarity of smoking behaviour, whereas within reciprocal friendships, social influence and possibly also social selection explained similarity of smoking behaviour. Sibling smoking behaviour was a more important predictor of adolescent smoking behaviour than parental smoking behaviour.
Social selection and social influence both promote similarity of smoking behaviour, and the impact of each process differs with the degree of reciprocity of friendships. These insights may contribute to further refinement of smoking prevention strategies.
本研究的目的是考察互惠和非互惠友谊中的社会选择和社会影响,以及父母和兄弟姐妹作为解释青少年朋友间吸烟行为相似性因素的作用。提出了一种新的社会选择-社会影响模型。
采用两次测量的纵向设计。
数据收集于欧洲吸烟预防框架方法(ESFA)研究对照组中的荷兰高中生。
样本包括1886名青少年,平均年龄为12.7岁。
主要结局指标是受访者、最好的朋友、父母和兄弟姐妹的吸烟行为。我们使用结构方程建模技术对社会选择-社会影响模型进行了检验。
社会选择和社会影响在解释朋友间吸烟行为的相似性方面都发挥了重要作用。在非互惠友谊中,只有社会选择解释了吸烟行为的相似性,而在互惠友谊中,社会影响以及可能的社会选择都解释了吸烟行为的相似性。兄弟姐妹的吸烟行为比父母的吸烟行为更能预测青少年的吸烟行为。
社会选择和社会影响都促进了吸烟行为的相似性,并且每个过程的影响因友谊的互惠程度而异。这些见解可能有助于进一步完善吸烟预防策略。