Sipo I, Fechner H, Pinkert S, Suckau L, Wang X, Weger S, Poller W
Department of Cardiology & Pneumology, Institute of Infectious Diseases, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Gene Ther. 2007 Sep;14(18):1319-29. doi: 10.1038/sj.gt.3302987. Epub 2007 Jul 5.
Recently it was shown that several new pseudotyped adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors support cardioselective expression of transgenes. The molecular mechanisms underlying this propensity for cardiac cell transduction are not well understood. We comparatively analyzed AAV vector attachment, internalization, intracellular trafficking, and nuclear uncoating of recombinant self-complementary (sc) AAV2.2 versus pseudotyped scAAV2.6 vectors expressing green fluorescence protein (GFP) in cells of cardiac origin. In cardiac-derived HL-1 cells and primary neonatal rat cardiomyocytes (PNCMs), expression of GFP increased rapidly after incubation with scAAV2.6-GFP, but remained low after scAAV2.2-GFP. Internalization of scAAV2.6-GFP was more efficient than that of scAAV2.2-GFP. Nuclear translocation was similarly efficient for both, but differential nuclear uncoating rates emerged as a key additional determinant of transduction: 30% of all scAAV2.6-GFP genomes translocated to the nucleus became uncoated within 48 h, but only 16% of scAAV2.2-GFP genomes. In contrast to this situation in cells of cardiac origin, scAAV2.2-GFP displayed more efficient internalization and similar (tumor cell line HeLa) or higher (human microvascular endothelial cell (HMEC)) uncoating rates than scAAV.2.6-GFP in non-cardiac cell types. In summary, both internalization and nuclear uncoating are key determinants of cardiac transduction by scAAV2.6 vectors. Any in vitro screening for the AAV pseudotype most suitable for cardiac gene therapy - which is desirable since it may allow significant reductions in vector load in upcoming clinical trials--needs to quantitate both key steps in transduction.
最近有研究表明,几种新型假型腺相关病毒(AAV)载体支持转基因的心脏选择性表达。这种心脏细胞转导倾向背后的分子机制尚未完全了解。我们比较分析了重组自互补(sc)AAV2.2与表达绿色荧光蛋白(GFP)的假型scAAV2.6载体在心脏来源细胞中的AAV载体附着、内化、细胞内运输和核去衣壳情况。在心脏来源的HL-1细胞和原代新生大鼠心肌细胞(PNCMs)中,与scAAV2.6-GFP孵育后,GFP的表达迅速增加,但与scAAV2.2-GFP孵育后仍保持在低水平。scAAV2.6-GFP的内化效率高于scAAV2.2-GFP。两者的核转位效率相似,但不同的核去衣壳率成为转导的另一个关键决定因素:所有转位到细胞核的scAAV2.6-GFP基因组中,有30%在48小时内去衣壳,但scAAV2.2-GFP基因组只有16%。与心脏来源细胞中的这种情况相反,在非心脏细胞类型中,scAAV2.2-GFP比scAAV2.6-GFP表现出更高的内化效率以及相似(肿瘤细胞系HeLa)或更高(人微血管内皮细胞(HMEC))的去衣壳率。总之,内化和核去衣壳都是scAAV2.6载体心脏转导的关键决定因素。任何针对最适合心脏基因治疗的AAV假型的体外筛选——这是很有必要的,因为它可能会在即将到来的临床试验中大幅降低载体负荷——都需要对转导的这两个关键步骤进行定量分析。