Wilson David C, Smith Nadine A, Blakey Nick C, Shaxson Louise
Imperial College, London, UK.
Waste Manag Res. 2007 Jun;25(3):247-56. doi: 10.1177/0734242X07079154.
The concept of a knowledge-based approach to policy making (also referred to as 'evidence-based policy making' or 'science meets policy') has been around for 10 years, and is widely 'signed up to' by Governments. This paper examines the theory and the practice at national government (using the UK as a case study) and European levels, looking at how the knowledge-based approach has been applied in waste and resources management. There is general agreement that a knowledge-(or evidence-) based approach to policy making is a 'good thing'; however putting the concept into practice has proven challenging and is still evolving. The linkages between researchers and policy makers need to be further strengthened, as does the 'demand' for evidence from policy; requiring policy specialists to articulate their requirements for evidence sufficiently well in advance, and to do so routinely, is still an area of weakness. Using a model developed by the UK's Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra), we examine in detail some of the implications of changing the question from 'is this good research on waste and resources issues?' to 'is this good evidence for waste and resources policy?'. The paper also provides recommendations for further work required to achieve this at a European level, and for priority areas where international co-ordination of waste and resources research could add most value to policy.
基于知识的决策方法(也称为“循证决策”或“科学与政策结合”)这一概念已经存在了10年,并且得到了各国政府的广泛认可。本文以英国为例,研究了国家政府层面(以英国为案例研究)和欧洲层面的理论与实践,探讨了基于知识的方法在废物与资源管理中的应用方式。人们普遍认为,基于知识(或证据)的决策方法是“好事”;然而,将这一概念付诸实践已被证明具有挑战性,并且仍在不断发展。研究人员与政策制定者之间的联系需要进一步加强,政策对证据的“需求”也是如此;要求政策专家提前充分明确阐述他们对证据的要求,并将其作为常规做法,这仍是一个薄弱环节。我们使用英国环境、食品和农村事务部(Defra)开发的一个模型,详细研究了将问题从“这是关于废物与资源问题的良好研究吗?”转变为“这是关于废物与资源政策的良好证据吗?”所产生的一些影响。本文还就欧洲层面实现这一目标所需的进一步工作,以及废物与资源研究的国际协调能够为政策带来最大价值的优先领域,提出了建议。