Shaxson Louise
Delta Partnership, Central Hall Westminster, Storey's Gate, London, UK.
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2009 Jul 27;364(1526):2141-51. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0283.
How can we strengthen the science-policy interface for plastics, the environment and human health? In a complex policy area with multiple stakeholders, it is important to clarify the nature of the particular plastics-related issue before trying to understand how to reconcile the supply and demand for evidence in policy. This article proposes a simple problem typology to assess the fundamental characteristics of a policy issue and thus identify appropriate processes for science-policy interactions. This is illustrated with two case studies from one UK Government Department, showing how policy and science meet over the environmental problems of plastics waste in the marine environment and on land. A problem-structuring methodology helps us understand why some policy issues can be addressed through relatively linear flows of science from experts to policymakers but why others demand a more reflexive approach to brokering the knowledge between science and policy. Suggestions are given at the end of the article for practical actions that can be taken on both sides.
我们如何加强塑料、环境与人类健康领域的科学-政策联系?在一个有多个利益相关者的复杂政策领域,在试图理解如何协调政策中证据的供需之前,明确特定塑料相关问题的性质很重要。本文提出了一种简单的问题类型学,以评估政策问题的基本特征,从而确定科学-政策互动的适当流程。这通过来自英国一个政府部门的两个案例研究进行说明,展示了政策与科学如何在海洋环境和陆地上的塑料垃圾环境问题上相遇。一种问题构建方法有助于我们理解为什么一些政策问题可以通过从专家到政策制定者的相对线性的科学流程来解决,而另一些问题则需要一种更具反思性的方法来促成科学与政策之间的知识交流。文章结尾给出了双方可以采取的实际行动建议。