Verhoff Marcel A, Durschnabel Melanie, Kreutz Kerstin
Aus dem Institut für Rechtsmedizin am Universitätsklinikum Giessen und Marburg.
Arch Kriminol. 2007 May-Jun;219(5-6):191-8.
In the course of an exhumation performed 5.5 years after death, several bone fragments were uncovered during the excavation of the clay-rich soil. Amongst others, there was a large piece of the frontal neurocranium. In addition, a so-called coffin stain was discernible. The exhumed coffin was intact. The forensic autopsy revealed a complete corpse with distinct adipocere formation. Consultation with the cemetery administration allowed the conclusion that the additional bone fragments were from the first use of the grave approximately 100 years ago. The heavily soil-encrusted skull fragment bore clear signs of a half sharp force, that could immediately be classified as postmortem. The pattern of injury pointed to an excavator as the cause. However, the question arose whether the postmortem trauma occurred 5.5 years ago during the excavation of the grave or during the current exhumation. First the skull fragment was dried. However, it was then impossible to remove the clay-rich soil without damaging the bone. The fragment was therefore carefully washed and dried again. The cut and fracture areas then showed distinctly lighter surfaces than the rest of the bone, which pointed to the exhumation as the time of origin. For comparison, fresh injuries were inflicted with a hatchet. These distinctly showed even lighter surfaces, so that the time of origin could be assumed to have been during the excavation of the grave 5.5 years ago.
在死后5.5年进行的一次尸体挖掘过程中,在挖掘富含黏土的土壤时发现了几块骨头碎片。其中有一大块额部颅骨。此外,还能看到一块所谓的棺木污渍。挖掘出的棺材完好无损。法医尸检发现尸体完整,有明显的尸蜡形成。与墓地管理部门协商后得出结论,额外的骨头碎片来自大约100年前该墓穴的首次使用。严重被土壤包裹的头骨碎片有明显的半锐器伤痕迹,可立即判定为死后形成。损伤模式表明是挖掘机造成的。然而,问题出现了,即死后创伤是5.5年前挖掘墓穴时还是当前挖掘尸体时造成的。首先将头骨碎片晾干。然而,之后不损坏骨头就无法去除富含黏土的土壤。因此,小心地清洗碎片并再次晾干。然后,切割和骨折区域的表面明显比骨头其他部分更浅,这表明挖掘尸体时是损伤形成时间。为作比较,用斧头制造新鲜损伤。这些损伤明显显示出更浅的表面,所以可以假定损伤形成时间是5.5年前挖掘墓穴时。