Suppr超能文献

罗格列酮在对患有胰岛素抵抗的非糖尿病受试者进行1年治疗后,可降低诊室血压和动态舒张压。

Rosiglitazone reduces office and diastolic ambulatory blood pressure following 1-year treatment in non-diabetic subjects with insulin resistance.

作者信息

Nilsson Peter M, Hedblad Bo, Donaldson Jill, Berglund Göran

机构信息

Department of Clinical Sciences Medicine, University Hospital, Malmo, Sweden.

出版信息

Blood Press. 2007;16(2):95-100. doi: 10.1080/08037050701396652.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Rosiglitazone (RSG) has been reported to reduce blood pressure (BP) in patients with type-2 diabetes, but similar effects in non-diabetic people with insulin resistance is less clear. Our aim was to test the long-term BP-lowering effects of RSG compared with placebo.

METHODS

We recruited participants for BP evaluation of RSG treatment from a larger intervention trial. Office BP was recorded in 355 non-diabetic subjects with insulin resistance randomized to receive either RSG or placebo for 52 weeks. Ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM; Spacelab 90207) was performed in a subgroup of 24 subjects (RSG: n = 11; placebo n = 13).

RESULTS

After 1 year, the office BP decreased by -3.1 mmHg systolic (p<0.05) and -3.8 mmHg diastolic (p<0.001) in the RSG group versus placebo. In patients treated with RSG, at 1 year there was a trend for a reduction from baseline for mean 24-h diastolic BP (DBP), daytime DBP and night-time DBP (-4.39, -5.26 and -2.93 mmHg, respectively). However, only daytime DBP was significantly lower in the RSG group compared with control (adjusted mean difference: -4.41 mmHg, p = 0.007). There was also a non-significant trend for a reduction in mean 24-h systolic BP (SBP), daytime SBP and night-time SBP (-2.70, -2.51 and -3.35 mmHg, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

RSG treatment for 1 year was associated with a small but significant decrease in diastolic 24-h ambulatory diastolic BP, and both systolic and diastolic office BPs in non-diabetic people with insulin resistance.

摘要

目的

已有报道称罗格列酮(RSG)可降低2型糖尿病患者的血压(BP),但在胰岛素抵抗的非糖尿病患者中的类似作用尚不清楚。我们的目的是测试与安慰剂相比,RSG的长期降压效果。

方法

我们从一项更大规模的干预试验中招募参与者进行RSG治疗的血压评估。记录了355名胰岛素抵抗的非糖尿病受试者的诊室血压,这些受试者被随机分为接受RSG或安慰剂治疗52周。对24名受试者的亚组(RSG组:n = 11;安慰剂组n = 13)进行了动态血压监测(ABPM;太空实验室90207)。

结果

1年后,与安慰剂组相比,RSG组的诊室收缩压下降了-3.1 mmHg(p<0.05),舒张压下降了-3.8 mmHg(p<0.001)。在接受RSG治疗的患者中,1年后平均24小时舒张压(DBP)、日间DBP和夜间DBP较基线有下降趋势(分别为-4.39、-5.26和-2.93 mmHg)。然而,与对照组相比,RSG组仅日间DBP显著降低(调整后平均差异:-4.41 mmHg,p = 0.007)。平均24小时收缩压(SBP)、日间SBP和夜间SBP也有非显著的下降趋势(分别为-2.70、-2.51和-3.35 mmHg)。

结论

在胰岛素抵抗的非糖尿病患者中,RSG治疗1年与24小时动态舒张压小幅但显著下降以及诊室收缩压和舒张压下降有关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验