• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医生的判断和综合老年医学评估(CGA)会选择不同的患者作为适合化疗的对象。

Physicians' judgement and comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) select different patients as fit for chemotherapy.

作者信息

Wedding Ulrich, Ködding Daphne, Pientka Ludger, Steinmetz Hans T, Schmitz Stefan

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Haematology and Medical Oncology, Friedrich Schiller University, Erlanger Allee 101, 07747 Jena, Germany.

出版信息

Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2007 Oct;64(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2007.05.001. Epub 2007 Jul 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2007.05.001
PMID:17613243
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Elderly cancer patients are a very heterogeneous population. A comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) shall help to identify more precisely those patients who are fit, compared to those who are vulnerable or frail, when deciding on chemotherapeutical treatment.

METHODS

In a prospective trial, 200 cancer patients treated in an out-patient setting were judged by their physician for their fitness for chemotherapy as fit, vulnerable or frail. A CGA was performed thereafter. We determined the feasibility of a CGA in an out-patient setting and the frequency of changes within the different assessment tools and compared physicians' judgement with the CGA results.

RESULTS

Physicians judged 64.3% of their patients as fit, 32.4% as vulnerable, and 3.2% as frail. A CGA was completed by 97.5% of patients and lasted 20min per patients (range: 9-47min). 26.5% of all patients had no deficits in the CGA. The CGA identified a mean of 1.7 problems per patient, 1.3 in patients judged as fit, 2.3 in those judged as vulnerable, and 4.2 in those judged as frail. A CGA is more sensitive in classifying patients as fit compared to vulnerable or frail than physicians' judgement.

CONCLUSION

A CGA is feasible and detects more elderly cancer patients as being unfit for chemotherapy than physicians' judgement. Further trials including disease and treatment related end-points are needed.

摘要

引言

老年癌症患者是一个非常多样化的群体。在决定化疗方案时,全面老年评估(CGA)有助于更准确地识别那些身体状况适合的患者,以及那些脆弱或虚弱的患者。

方法

在一项前瞻性试验中,200名在门诊接受治疗的癌症患者由其医生评估化疗适合度,分为适合、脆弱或虚弱三类。之后进行了全面老年评估。我们确定了在门诊环境中进行全面老年评估的可行性以及不同评估工具中变化的频率,并将医生的判断与全面老年评估结果进行了比较。

结果

医生将64.3%的患者判断为适合,32.4%为脆弱,3.2%为虚弱。97.5%的患者完成了全面老年评估,每位患者耗时20分钟(范围:9 - 47分钟)。所有患者中有26.5%在全面老年评估中无缺陷。全面老年评估发现每位患者平均存在1.7个问题,被判断为适合的患者为1.3个,被判断为脆弱的患者为2.3个,被判断为虚弱的患者为4.2个。与医生的判断相比,全面老年评估在将患者分类为适合而非脆弱或虚弱方面更敏感。

结论

全面老年评估是可行的,并且与医生的判断相比,能发现更多不适合化疗的老年癌症患者。需要进一步开展包括疾病和治疗相关终点的试验。

相似文献

1
Physicians' judgement and comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) select different patients as fit for chemotherapy.医生的判断和综合老年医学评估(CGA)会选择不同的患者作为适合化疗的对象。
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2007 Oct;64(1):1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2007.05.001. Epub 2007 Jul 5.
2
A comprehensive geriatric assessment is more effective than clinical judgment to identify elderly diffuse large cell lymphoma patients who benefit from aggressive therapy.全面老年医学评估在识别能从积极治疗中获益的老年弥漫大B细胞淋巴瘤患者方面比临床判断更有效。
Cancer. 2009 Oct 1;115(19):4547-53. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24490.
3
Management of Frail and Not-Frail elderly cancer patients in a hospital-based geriatric oncology program.在以医院为基础的老年肿瘤项目中对体弱和非体弱老年癌症患者的管理。
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2008 May;66(2):163-70. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2007.12.006. Epub 2008 Feb 19.
4
Multidimensional geriatric evaluation for older cancer patients as a clinical and research tool.老年癌症患者的多维老年评估作为一种临床和研究工具。
Cancer Treat Rev. 2009 Oct;35(6):487-92. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2009.04.005. Epub 2009 May 28.
5
A practical approach to geriatric assessment in oncology.肿瘤学中老年人评估的实用方法。
J Clin Oncol. 2007 May 10;25(14):1936-44. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.10.2954.
6
Comprehensive geriatric assessment and its clinical impact in oncology.老年综合评估及其在肿瘤学中的临床影响。
Eur J Cancer. 2007 Oct;43(15):2161-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2007.08.002. Epub 2007 Sep 12.
7
A pilot study of the vulnerable elders survey-13 compared with the comprehensive geriatric assessment for identifying disability in older patients with prostate cancer who receive androgen ablation.一项关于脆弱老年人调查-13的初步研究与综合老年医学评估的比较,以识别接受雄激素剥夺治疗的老年前列腺癌患者的残疾情况。
Cancer. 2007 Feb 15;109(4):802-10. doi: 10.1002/cncr.22495.
8
Vulnerable and frail elderly: an approach to the management of the main tumour types.脆弱和体弱的老年人:主要肿瘤类型的管理方法
Eur J Cancer. 2008 Mar;44(4):488-93. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.01.002. Epub 2008 Jan 31.
9
[Chemotherapy for colorectal carcinoma in the elderly].[老年人大肠癌的化疗]
Z Gastroenterol. 2004 Oct;42(10):1189-98. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-812927.
10
Shall we operate? Preoperative assessment in elderly cancer patients (PACE) can help. A SIOG surgical task force prospective study.我们要进行手术吗?老年癌症患者术前评估(PACE)或许能提供帮助。一项老年肿瘤学会外科特别工作组的前瞻性研究。
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2008 Feb;65(2):156-63. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2007.11.001. Epub 2007 Dec 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Acute Promyelocytic Leukemia in the Real World: Understanding Outcome Differences and How We Can Improve Them.现实世界中的急性早幼粒细胞白血病:理解结局差异以及我们如何改善这些差异。
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Dec 6;16(23):4092. doi: 10.3390/cancers16234092.
2
Evaluation of a new two-step frailty assessment of head and neck patients in a prospective cohort.评估前瞻性队列中头颈部患者的新型两步法脆弱性评估。
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Aug;281(8):4291-4304. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-08651-8. Epub 2024 Apr 23.
3
Risk Factor Analysis of Morbidity and 90-Day Mortality of Curative Resection in Patients with Stage IIIA-N2 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer after Induction Concurrent Chemoradiation Therapy.
IIIA-N2期非小细胞肺癌患者诱导同步放化疗后根治性切除的发病率及90天死亡率的危险因素分析
J Chest Surg. 2024 Jul 5;57(4):351-359. doi: 10.5090/jcs.23.165. Epub 2024 Apr 8.
4
Impact of Primary Tumor Location on Demographics, Resectability, Outcomes, and Quality of Life in Finnish Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients (Subgroup Analysis of the RAXO Study).原发性肿瘤位置对芬兰转移性结直肠癌患者的人口统计学、可切除性、预后及生活质量的影响(RAXO研究的亚组分析)
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Mar 5;16(5):1052. doi: 10.3390/cancers16051052.
5
The early predictive value of frailty for health-related quality of life among elderly patients with cancer receiving curative chemotherapy.虚弱对接受根治性化疗的老年癌症患者健康相关生活质量的早期预测价值。
PLoS One. 2023 Aug 2;18(8):e0287320. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0287320. eCollection 2023.
6
Resectability, Resections, Survival Outcomes, and Quality of Life in Older Adult Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (the RAXO-Study).老年转移性结直肠癌患者的可切除性、切除术、生存结果及生活质量(RAXO研究)
J Clin Med. 2023 May 18;12(10):3541. doi: 10.3390/jcm12103541.
7
Treatments for elderly cancer patients and reforms to social security systems in Japan.日本老年癌症患者的治疗和社会保障制度改革。
Int J Clin Oncol. 2022 Feb;27(2):310-315. doi: 10.1007/s10147-021-02099-0. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
8
Patient assessment and feasibility of treatment in older patients with cancer: results from the IN-GHO Registry.癌症老年患者的评估和治疗可行性:IN-GHO 登记研究结果。
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2021 Nov;147(11):3183-3194. doi: 10.1007/s00432-021-03714-3. Epub 2021 Jul 26.
9
Toxicity, Response and Survival in Older Patients with Metastatic Melanoma Treated with Checkpoint Inhibitors.接受检查点抑制剂治疗的老年转移性黑色素瘤患者的毒性、反应和生存情况
Cancers (Basel). 2021 Jun 5;13(11):2826. doi: 10.3390/cancers13112826.
10
Impact of the comprehensive geriatric assessment on treatment decision in geriatric oncology.老年肿瘤患者综合老年评估对治疗决策的影响。
BMC Cancer. 2020 May 6;20(1):384. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-06878-2.