Benjamin Sara E, Neelon Brian, Ball Sarah C, Bangdiwala Shrikant I, Ammerman Alice S, Ward Dianne S
Department of Ambulatory Care and Prevention, Harvard Medical School and Harvard Pilgrim Health Care, Boston, MA, USA.
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2007 Jul 5;4:29. doi: 10.1186/1479-5868-4-29.
Few assessment instruments have examined the nutrition and physical activity environments in child care, and none are self-administered. Given the emerging focus on child care settings as a target for intervention, a valid and reliable measure of the nutrition and physical activity environment is needed.
To measure inter-rater reliability, 59 child care center directors and 109 staff completed the self-assessment concurrently, but independently. Three weeks later, a repeat self-assessment was completed by a sub-sample of 38 directors to assess test-retest reliability. To assess criterion validity, a researcher-administered environmental assessment was conducted at 69 centers and was compared to a self-assessment completed by the director. A weighted kappa test statistic and percent agreement were calculated to assess agreement for each question on the self-assessment.
For inter-rater reliability, kappa statistics ranged from 0.20 to 1.00 across all questions. Test-retest reliability of the self-assessment yielded kappa statistics that ranged from 0.07 to 1.00. The inter-quartile kappa statistic ranges for inter-rater and test-retest reliability were 0.45 to 0.63 and 0.27 to 0.45, respectively. When percent agreement was calculated, questions ranged from 52.6% to 100% for inter-rater reliability and 34.3% to 100% for test-retest reliability. Kappa statistics for validity ranged from -0.01 to 0.79, with an inter-quartile range of 0.08 to 0.34. Percent agreement for validity ranged from 12.9% to 93.7%.
This study provides estimates of criterion validity, inter-rater reliability and test-retest reliability for an environmental nutrition and physical activity self-assessment instrument for child care. Results indicate that the self-assessment is a stable and reasonably accurate instrument for use with child care interventions. We therefore recommend the Nutrition and Physical Activity Self-Assessment for Child Care (NAP SACC) instrument to researchers and practitioners interested in conducting healthy weight intervention in child care. However, a more robust, less subjective measure would be more appropriate for researchers seeking an outcome measure to assess intervention impact.
很少有评估工具对儿童保育机构中的营养与身体活动环境进行过考察,且没有一种是可自行施测的。鉴于儿童保育机构日益成为干预的目标,因此需要一种有效且可靠的营养与身体活动环境测量方法。
为了测量评分者间信度,59名儿童保育中心主任和109名工作人员同时独立完成了自我评估。三周后,38名主任组成的子样本再次完成自我评估,以评估重测信度。为了评估效标效度,研究人员在69个中心进行了环境评估,并与主任完成的自我评估进行比较。计算加权kappa检验统计量和一致百分比,以评估自我评估中每个问题的一致性。
对于评分者间信度,所有问题的kappa统计量范围为0.20至1.00。自我评估的重测信度得出的kappa统计量范围为0.07至1.00。评分者间信度和重测信度的四分位间距kappa统计量范围分别为0.45至0.63和0.27至0.45。计算一致百分比时,评分者间信度的问题范围为52.6%至100%,重测信度的问题范围为34.3%至100%。效度的kappa统计量范围为-0.01至0.79,四分位间距为0.08至0.34。效度的一致百分比范围为12.9%至93.7%。
本研究提供了一种用于儿童保育机构的环境营养与身体活动自我评估工具的效标效度、评分者间信度和重测信度估计值。结果表明,自我评估是一种稳定且相当准确的工具,可用于儿童保育干预。因此,我们向有兴趣在儿童保育机构开展健康体重干预的研究人员和从业者推荐儿童保育营养与身体活动自我评估(NAP SACC)工具。然而,对于寻求结果测量指标以评估干预效果的研究人员而言,一种更稳健、主观性更低的测量方法会更为合适。