Pandya Pritesh K, Rathbun Daniel L, Moucha Raluca, Engineer Navzer D, Kilgard Michael P
Department of Speech and Hearing Science, College of Applied Health Sciences, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 901 South Sixth Street, Champaign, IL 61820, USA.
Cereb Cortex. 2008 Feb;18(2):301-14. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhm055. Epub 2007 Jul 5.
The rat auditory cortex is divided anatomically into several areas, but little is known about the functional differences in information processing between these areas. To determine the filter properties of rat posterior auditory field (PAF) neurons, we compared neurophysiological responses to simple tones, frequency modulated (FM) sweeps, and amplitude modulated noise and tones with responses of primary auditory cortex (A1) neurons. PAF neurons have excitatory receptive fields that are on average 65% broader than A1 neurons. The broader receptive fields of PAF neurons result in responses to narrow and broadband inputs that are stronger than A1. In contrast to A1, we found little evidence for an orderly topographic gradient in PAF based on frequency. These neurons exhibit latencies that are twice as long as A1. In response to modulated tones and noise, PAF neurons adapt to repeated stimuli at significantly slower rates. Unlike A1, neurons in PAF rarely exhibit facilitation to rapidly repeated sounds. Neurons in PAF do not exhibit strong selectivity for rate or direction of narrowband one octave FM sweeps. These results indicate that PAF, like nonprimary visual fields, processes sensory information on larger spectral and longer temporal scales than primary cortex.
大鼠听觉皮层在解剖学上可分为几个区域,但对于这些区域之间信息处理的功能差异却知之甚少。为了确定大鼠后听区(PAF)神经元的滤波特性,我们将对简单音调、调频(FM)扫描、调幅噪声和音调的神经生理反应与初级听觉皮层(A1)神经元的反应进行了比较。PAF神经元具有兴奋性感受野,其平均宽度比A1神经元宽65%。PAF神经元更宽的感受野导致其对窄带和宽带输入的反应比A1更强。与A1不同,我们几乎没有发现基于频率的PAF中有有序地形梯度的证据。这些神经元的潜伏期是A1的两倍。在对调制音调和噪声的反应中,PAF神经元对重复刺激的适应速度明显较慢。与A1不同,PAF中的神经元很少对快速重复的声音表现出易化作用。PAF中的神经元对窄带一个八度FM扫描的速率或方向没有很强的选择性。这些结果表明,PAF与非初级视觉区域一样,在比初级皮层更大的频谱和更长的时间尺度上处理感觉信息。