Holm Charlotte, Mayr Martina, Höfter Eugen, Ninkovic Milomir
Department of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Burn Centre, Klinikum Bogenhausen, Technical University Munich, Englschalkingerstrasse 77, 81925 Munich, Germany.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2007;60(8):946-51. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2005.12.066. Epub 2006 Nov 20.
Following the TRAM and the DIEP the SIEA flap is the next logical step to reduce the donor site morbidity in autologous breast reconstruction. The vascular axis of the SIEA flap, however, is completely different from the deep epigastric pedicle, on which previous lower abdominal flaps were based. Therefore, a mapping of the vascular territory, which can be reliably harvested on this pedicle, seems mandatory before this new technique can become established.
To chart the angiosome of the superficial inferior epigastric artery with regard to breast reconstruction and to evaluate the random extension of the vascular territory, which can be reliably raised on this pedicle.
Clinical, prospective study in a university-affiliated department of plastic surgery.
Ten patients undergoing autologous breast reconstruction with the superficial inferior epigastric perforator flap and five patients undergoing aesthetic abdominoplasty with isolation of the abdominal flap on the superficial epigastric vessels.
After isolation of the abdominal panniculus on a single superficial inferior epigastric artery pedicle, the flap was divided in the four conventional zones according to Hartrampf. Perfusion in each of the four zones was measured on the table using the technique of dynamic laser-fluorescence videoangiography.
Perfusion of Hartrampf Zone III occurred first (25s post-injection) and the perfusion index amounted median 89% of reference. Perfusion of Zone I occurred median 5s later and the relative perfusion was 80%. Perfusion of the contralateral zones II and IV was dramatically reduced to 8% and zero, respectively, and this reduction was statistically significant (p<0.0001).
The true angiosome of the superficial epigastric artery is located laterally on the ipsilateral hemiabdomen. Its random extension is unreliable and ranges most frequently only to the midline. Based on the results of this study, survival of the skin and subcutaneous fat taken laterally to the border of the contralateral rectus sheath seems questionable. Therefore, the versatility of the SIEA flap for autologous breast reconstruction seems limited when compared with the conventional methods based on the deep inferior epigastric system.
继横行腹直肌肌皮瓣(TRAM)和腹壁下动脉穿支皮瓣(DIEP)之后,腹壁浅动脉穿支皮瓣(SIEA)是降低自体乳房重建供区并发症的下一个合理选择。然而,SIEA皮瓣的血管轴与以往下腹部皮瓣所依赖的腹壁下深血管蒂完全不同。因此,在这项新技术得以确立之前,似乎必须先绘制出基于该血管蒂能够可靠切取的血管区域图。
绘制腹壁浅动脉的血管体分布图,用于乳房重建,并评估基于该血管蒂能够可靠掀起的血管区域的随机延伸范围。
在一所大学附属医院的整形外科进行的临床前瞻性研究。
10例行腹壁浅动脉穿支皮瓣自体乳房重建的患者,以及5例行腹壁浅血管腹壁瓣分离的美容腹部整形术的患者。
在单一腹壁浅动脉血管蒂上分离腹部皮瓣后,根据哈特朗普法将皮瓣分为四个传统区域。在手术台上使用动态激光荧光视频血管造影技术测量四个区域中每个区域的灌注情况。
哈特朗普夫Ⅲ区最先出现灌注(注射后25秒),灌注指数中位数为参照值的89%。Ⅰ区灌注中位数延迟5秒出现,相对灌注率为80%。对侧的Ⅱ区和Ⅳ区灌注显著降低,分别降至8%和零,且这种降低具有统计学意义(p<0.0001)。
腹壁浅动脉的真正血管体位于同侧半腹部的外侧。其随机延伸不可靠,最常见的范围仅到中线。基于本研究结果,取自对侧腹直肌鞘边界外侧的皮肤和皮下脂肪的存活情况似乎存疑。因此,与基于腹壁下深血管系统的传统方法相比,SIEA皮瓣用于自体乳房重建的适用性似乎有限。