Storz Brian L, Travis Joseph
Department of Biological Science, Florida State University, Tallahassee, Florida, USA.
ScientificWorldJournal. 2007 May 29;7:715-26. doi: 10.1100/tsw.2007.159.
Many organisms that develop in a variable environment show correlated patterns of phenotypic plasticity in several traits. Any individual trait modification can be beneficial, neutral, or deleterious in any particular environment; the organism's total fitness, which determines if the plasticity is adaptive, is the sum of these changes. Although much is known about how plastic traits contribute to fitness, less is known about the extent to which the various trait changes involved in the plastic responses share their developmental control. Shared control suggests that the various responses evolved in unison, but independent control suggests independent evolution of many components. Spadefoot toads have evolved adaptive polyphenism to cope with developing in rapidly drying ephemeral ponds. Larvae hatch as omnivores, but on exposure to an environmental cue, may develop into carnivores. We compared trait development in the two morphs and found that differences in jaw musculature, head dimensions, and intestines emerged early in development, whereas differences in shape of the tail emerged later. In omnivores, all traits except intestine length and hind-limb length were negatively allometric with body length; in carnivores, two of three jaw muscles displayed positive allometry and, among those that were negatively allometric, all except head width showed larger allometric coefficients in carnivores. Hind-limb length was positively allometric in both forms, but the allometric coefficients did not differ significantly. Intestine length was positively allometric to body length in both forms, but in this case, omnivores exhibited the higher coefficient. These results suggest that spadefoot plasticity is trait specific and the responses are suggestive of the existence of at least two modules: a suite of trophic traits that responds early in development and a suite of tail traits that responds later. The developmental control of these suites is the subject of further investigation.
许多在多变环境中发育的生物在多个性状上表现出相关的表型可塑性模式。在任何特定环境中,任何单个性状的改变都可能是有益的、中性的或有害的;决定可塑性是否具有适应性的生物体总适合度是这些变化的总和。尽管人们对可塑性性状如何影响适合度已经了解很多,但对于可塑性反应中涉及的各种性状变化在多大程度上共享其发育控制却知之甚少。共享控制表明各种反应是协同进化的,但独立控制则表明许多组成部分是独立进化的。锄足蟾已经进化出适应性多型现象来应对在迅速干涸的临时池塘中的发育。幼虫孵化时是杂食性的,但在受到环境信号刺激后,可能会发育成肉食性。我们比较了两种形态的性状发育,发现颌部肌肉组织、头部尺寸和肠道的差异在发育早期就出现了,而尾巴形状的差异出现得较晚。在杂食性个体中,除肠道长度和后肢长度外,所有性状与体长呈负异速生长;在肉食性个体中,三块颌部肌肉中有两块表现出正异速生长,在呈负异速生长的性状中,除头部宽度外,肉食性个体的所有性状异速生长系数都更大。后肢长度在两种形态中均呈正异速生长,但异速生长系数没有显著差异。肠道长度在两种形态中均与体长呈正异速生长,但在这种情况下,杂食性个体的系数更高。这些结果表明锄足蟾的可塑性是性状特异性的,并且这些反应表明至少存在两个模块:一组在发育早期做出反应的营养性状和一组在后期做出反应的尾巴性状。这些性状组合的发育控制是进一步研究的主题。