• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Subtrochanteric femur fractures: a comparison of the Zickel nail, 95 degrees blade plate, and interlocking nail.

作者信息

Brien W W, Wiss D A, Becker V, Lehman T

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Los Angeles County-University of Southern California Medical Center.

出版信息

J Orthop Trauma. 1991;5(4):458-64.

PMID:1762008
Abstract

Seventy-nine nonconsecutive patients with subtrochanteric femur fractures were divided into three groups based on the method of fracture fixation. Group I consisted of 21 patients treated with a Zickel nail, Group II comprised 25 patients treated with a 95 degrees blade plate, and Group III included 33 patients treated with an interlocking nail. All patients in Group I and Group II had open reduction and internal fixation of their fractures. Ninety-four percent of the patients in Group III were treated by closed intramedullary nailing. The average operating times for Groups I, II, and III were 212, 272, and 181 min, respectively, while blood loss averaged 900, 1,500, and 600 ml for each group, respectively. Group I had one infection, ten malunions, and one nonunion. Group II had one infection, six malunions, and two nonunions. Group III had no infections, two malunions, and one nonunion. We conclude that closed interlocking nailing is the treatment of choice for acute nonpathologic subtrochanteric femur fractures in adults. There is decreased blood loss, reduced operating time, and fewer complications than with either the Zickel nail or the 95 degrees blade plate regardless of the fracture pattern or the degree of fracture comminution.

摘要

相似文献

1
Subtrochanteric femur fractures: a comparison of the Zickel nail, 95 degrees blade plate, and interlocking nail.
J Orthop Trauma. 1991;5(4):458-64.
2
Subtrochanteric fractures of the femur. Results of treatment by interlocking nailing.股骨转子下骨折。交锁髓内钉治疗结果
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992 Oct(283):231-6.
3
Randomized, prospective comparison of plate versus intramedullary nail fixation for distal tibia shaft fractures.随机、前瞻性比较钢板与髓内钉固定治疗胫骨骨干远端骨折。
J Orthop Trauma. 2011 Dec;25(12):736-41. doi: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318213f709.
4
Subtrochanteric fractures: Zickel nail or nail-plate?
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1986 Mar;68(2):255-9. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.68B2.3958011.
5
Subtrochanteric femur nonunion - Chasing the elusive an analysis of two techniques to achieve union: Nail-plate fixation and plate-structural fibula graft fixation.股骨转子下骨不连——追寻难以捉摸的愈合:两种实现愈合技术的分析:钉板固定和结构性腓骨移植板固定
Injury. 2024 Jun;55(6):111462. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2024.111462. Epub 2024 Feb 28.
6
Subtrochanteric fracture of the femur. Fixation using the Zickel nail.
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987 Sep;69(7):1032-40.
7
[A comparisive study between intramedullary interlocking nail and plate-screw fixation in the treatment of tibial shaft fractures].[交锁髓内钉与钢板螺钉内固定治疗胫骨干骨折的对比研究]
Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2008 Apr;21(4):261-3.
8
Subtrochanteric fractures of the femur treated with the Zickel nail.
Injury. 1993 Feb;24(2):93-6. doi: 10.1016/0020-1383(93)90196-d.
9
The challenge of non-union in subtrochanteric fractures with breakage of intramedullary nail: evaluation of outcomes in surgery revision with angled blade plate and allograft bone strut.髓内钉断裂的转子下骨折不愈合的挑战:采用角钢板和同种异体骨支撑进行手术翻修的疗效评估
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2017 Dec;43(6):853-861. doi: 10.1007/s00068-016-0755-5. Epub 2017 Mar 3.
10
Nonunion of fractures of the subtrochanteric region of the femur.股骨转子下区域骨折不愈合。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004 Feb(419):185-8. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200402000-00030.

引用本文的文献

1
[Osteosynthesis of subtrochanteric femoral fractures in adults].[成人股骨转子下骨折的骨固定术]
Chirurgie (Heidelb). 2025 Jun 26. doi: 10.1007/s00104-025-02334-8.
2
Retrograde intramedullary nailing or locked plating for stabilisation of distal femoral fractures? A comparative study of 193 patients.逆行髓内钉或锁定钢板治疗股骨远端骨折?193 例患者的对比研究。
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2024 Jan;34(1):471-478. doi: 10.1007/s00590-023-03650-7. Epub 2023 Aug 24.
3
Subtrochanteric femur fractures: current review of management.
股骨转子下骨折:当前治疗综述
EFORT Open Rev. 2021 Feb 1;6(2):145-151. doi: 10.1302/2058-5241.6.200048. eCollection 2021 Feb.
4
Intramedullary versus extramedullary fixation in the treatment of subtrochanteric femur fractures: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.髓内固定与髓外固定治疗股骨转子下骨折的综合系统评价与Meta分析
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2020 Nov;54(6):639-646. doi: 10.5152/j.aott.2020.19216.
5
Management of Subtrochanteric Proximal Femur Fractures: A Review of Recent Literature.股骨转子下近端骨折的治疗:近期文献综述
Adv Orthop. 2018 Oct 28;2018:1326701. doi: 10.1155/2018/1326701. eCollection 2018.
6
A study of 44 patients with subtrochanteric fractures treated using long nail and cerclage cables.一项对44例使用长钉和环扎钢缆治疗的转子下骨折患者的研究。
Musculoskelet Surg. 2015 Dec;99(3):225-30. doi: 10.1007/s12306-015-0385-9. Epub 2015 Oct 29.
7
Four pins assisted reduction of complex segmental femoral fractures: a technique for closed reduction.四枚钢针辅助复位复杂股骨节段性骨折:一种闭合复位技术
J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci. 2014 Dec;34(6):912-916. doi: 10.1007/s11596-014-1373-2. Epub 2014 Dec 6.
8
Treatment of subtrochanteric femoral fractures using Selfdynamisable internal fixator.应用自稳定可动型内固定器治疗股骨转子下骨折。
Clin Orthop Surg. 2010 Dec;2(4):227-31. doi: 10.4055/cios.2010.2.4.227. Epub 2010 Nov 5.
9
Locked nailing for shortened subtrochanteric nonunions: a one-stage treatment.锁定髓内钉治疗缩短型转子下骨不连:一期治疗
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Jan;467(1):254-9. doi: 10.1007/s11999-008-0380-7. Epub 2008 Jul 22.
10
[Corrective osteotomy of post-traumatic malunions and pseudarthroses in the femur using a fork plate: a prospective analysis of 23 consecutive cases].[使用叉形钢板对股骨创伤后畸形愈合和假关节进行矫正截骨术:23例连续病例的前瞻性分析]
Unfallchirurg. 2007 Mar;110(3):205-12. doi: 10.1007/s00113-006-1211-5.