Allardyce Judith, Suppes Trisha, Van Os Jim
Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, South Limburg Mental Health Research and Teaching Network, EURON, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2007;16 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S34-40. doi: 10.1002/mpr.214.
In this paper, we discuss the conceptual background for including a dimensional component to the DSM V diagnoses for psychoses. We review the evidence for a continuous distribution of psychosis like symptoms in the general population and summarise the research validating the clinical usefulness of psychopathological dimensions. We conclude that diagnostic models using both categorical and dimensional representations of psychosis have better predictive validity than either model independently. Dimensions do not appear to be diagnosis specific so a flexible scoring of dimensions across all psychotic and major affective disorders may be potentially more informative than a system where categorical diagnoses are kept artificially dimension-specific.
在本文中,我们讨论了在《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第五版(DSM V)中纳入精神病维度成分的概念背景。我们回顾了普通人群中精神病性症状呈连续分布的证据,并总结了验证精神病理学维度临床实用性的研究。我们得出结论,使用精神病的分类和维度表示的诊断模型比单独的任何一种模型都具有更好的预测效度。维度似乎并非特定于诊断,因此与将分类诊断人为地保持在特定维度的系统相比,对所有精神病性和主要情感障碍进行灵活的维度评分可能更具信息量。