• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

慢性肾脏病贫血患者从达比加群酯转换为促红细胞生成素α的给药模式、药物成本和血液学结果。

Dosing patterns, drug costs, and hematologic outcome in anemic patients with chronic kidney disease switching from darbepoetin alfa to epoetin alfa.

作者信息

Hymes Jeffrey, Bickimer Tammy, Jackson James H, Bookhart Brahim K, Mody Samir H, Tak Piech Catherine

机构信息

Nephrology Associates, Nashville, TN, USA.

出版信息

Curr Med Res Opin. 2007 Aug;23(8):1931-7. doi: 10.1185/030079907X210705.

DOI:10.1185/030079907X210705
PMID:17624232
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare real-world dosing patterns, drug costs, and hematologic outcome in anemic chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients, not receiving dialysis, who switched from darbepoetin alfa (DARB) to epoetin alfa (EPO) in a community practice setting.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This retrospective observational chart review from a US nephrology clinic included 153 anemic CKD patients > or = 18 years of age who did not receive dialysis during the study period, switched from DARB to EPO between 8/2003 and 8/2005, and received > or = 2 doses of both agents. Paired t-test and McNemar's chi-square were performed comparing pre-switch and post-switch outcomes.

RESULTS

Mean interval between doses increased from 24.3 +/- 11.1 days with DARB to 28.8 +/- 19.8 days with EPO (p = 0.001). Weighted mean pre-switch weekly dose for DARB was 25 mug, while weighted mean post-switch weekly dose for EPO was 7090 Units, resulting in a dose ratio (Units EPO:microg DARB) of 287:1. These doses resulted in mean weekly costs of $110 (DARB) and $86 (EPO). Mean hemoglobin (Hb) levels increased over time from 10.8 g/dL at 6 months pre-switch to 11.1 g/dL 6 months after EPO initiation (p = 0.0132). Mean Hb levels were > 11 g/dL, but below 12 g/dL, while patients received EPO.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients switching from DARB to EPO had a greater mean interval between doses, lower drug costs, and consistently maintained recommended Hb levels over time.

LIMITATIONS

The reverse direction (EPO to DARB) was not investigated. Although treatment outcomes were not assessed in a randomized, controlled setting, the study's observational nature provided actual evidence in a real-world setting.

摘要

目的

比较在社区实践环境中,未接受透析的贫血慢性肾脏病(CKD)患者从达比加群酯(DARB)转换为促红细胞生成素(EPO)后的实际给药模式、药物成本和血液学结果。

研究设计与方法

这项来自美国肾脏病诊所的回顾性观察图表审查纳入了153例年龄≥18岁的贫血CKD患者,这些患者在研究期间未接受透析,于2003年8月至2005年8月期间从DARB转换为EPO,且两种药物均接受了≥2剂。采用配对t检验和McNemar卡方检验比较转换前和转换后的结果。

结果

给药间隔的平均时间从使用DARB时的24.3±11.1天增加到使用EPO时的28.8±19.8天(p = 0.001)。转换前DARB的加权平均每周剂量为25μg,而转换后EPO的加权平均每周剂量为7090单位,剂量比(EPO单位:μg DARB)为287:1。这些剂量导致每周平均成本分别为110美元(DARB)和86美元(EPO)。平均血红蛋白(Hb)水平随时间从转换前6个月的10.8 g/dL增加到开始使用EPO后6个月的11.1 g/dL(p = 0.0132)。患者接受EPO治疗期间,平均Hb水平>11 g/dL但低于12 g/dL。

结论

从DARB转换为EPO的患者给药间隔平均时间更长,药物成本更低,且随着时间推移持续维持推荐的Hb水平。

局限性

未研究相反方向(从EPO转换为DARB)。尽管未在随机对照环境中评估治疗结果,但该研究的观察性质提供了真实世界环境中的实际证据。

相似文献

1
Dosing patterns, drug costs, and hematologic outcome in anemic patients with chronic kidney disease switching from darbepoetin alfa to epoetin alfa.慢性肾脏病贫血患者从达比加群酯转换为促红细胞生成素α的给药模式、药物成本和血液学结果。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2007 Aug;23(8):1931-7. doi: 10.1185/030079907X210705.
2
Dosing patterns, hematologic outcomes, and costs of erythropoietic agents in predialysis chronic kidney disease patients with anemia.透析前慢性肾病贫血患者促红细胞生成剂的给药模式、血液学结果及成本
Curr Med Res Opin. 2006 May;22(5):837-42. doi: 10.1185/030079906X100113.
3
Dosing patterns, hematologic outcomes, and costs of erythropoietic agents in anemic predialysis chronic kidney disease patients from an observational study.一项观察性研究中,贫血的透析前慢性肾病患者促红细胞生成剂的给药模式、血液学结果及成本
Am J Ther. 2007 Jul-Aug;14(4):322-7. doi: 10.1097/MJT.0b013e31804bddec.
4
Dosing patterns and costs of erythropoietic agents in patients with chronic kidney disease not on dialysis in managed care organizations.管理式医疗组织中未接受透析的慢性肾脏病患者促红细胞生成剂的给药模式及成本
Clin Ther. 2006 Sep;28(9):1443-50. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2006.09.020.
5
Dosing intervals and hemoglobin control in patients with chronic kidney disease and anemia treated with epoetin alfa or darbepoetin alfa: a retrospective cohort study.慢性肾脏病合并贫血患者接受促红细胞生成素α或达比加群酯治疗时的给药间隔与血红蛋白控制:一项回顾性队列研究
Clin Ther. 2007 Sep;29(9):2010-21. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.09.012.
6
Dosing patterns and treatment costs of erythropoietic agents in elderly patients with pre-dialysis chronic kidney disease in managed care organisations.管理式医疗组织中,老年透析前慢性肾病患者促红细胞生成剂的给药模式及治疗成本
Drugs Aging. 2006;23(12):969-76. doi: 10.2165/00002512-200623120-00004.
7
Retrospective observational study of patients with chemotherapy-related anemia receiving erythropoietic agents.对接受促红细胞生成剂治疗的化疗相关性贫血患者的回顾性观察研究。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2005 Sep;21(9):1347-54. doi: 10.1185/030079905X56556.
8
Randomized comparison of epoetin alfa (40,000 U weekly) and darbepoetin alfa (200 microg every 2 weeks) in anemic patients with cancer receiving chemotherapy.接受化疗的癌症贫血患者中,促红细胞生成素α(每周40,000单位)与达贝泊汀α(每2周200微克)的随机对照比较
Oncologist. 2005 Sep;10(8):642-50. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.10-8-642.
9
Drug utilisation and cost considerations of erythropoiesis stimulating agents in oncology patients receiving chemotherapy: observations from a large managed-care database.肿瘤化疗患者的红细胞生成刺激剂的药物利用和成本考虑:来自大型管理式医疗数据库的观察结果。
J Med Econ. 2009 Mar;12(1):1-8. doi: 10.3111/13696990802648167.
10
Dosing patterns, treatment costs, and frequency of physician visits in adults with cancer receiving erythropoietic agents in managed care organizations.在管理式医疗组织中接受促红细胞生成剂治疗的成年癌症患者的给药模式、治疗成本及就诊频率。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2006 Sep;22(9):1623-31. doi: 10.1185/030079906X120968.

引用本文的文献

1
Effects of three kinds of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents on renal anemia in Japanese non-dialysis chronic kidney disease patients.三种促红细胞生成剂对日本非透析慢性肾脏病患者肾性贫血的影响。
Clin Exp Nephrol. 2014 Oct;18(5):755-62. doi: 10.1007/s10157-013-0919-0. Epub 2013 Dec 7.