Suppr超能文献

对接受促红细胞生成剂治疗的化疗相关性贫血患者的回顾性观察研究。

Retrospective observational study of patients with chemotherapy-related anemia receiving erythropoietic agents.

作者信息

Mark Tami L, McKenzie R Scott, Fastenau John, Piech Catherine Tak

机构信息

Thomson Medstat, Washington, DC 20008, USA.

出版信息

Curr Med Res Opin. 2005 Sep;21(9):1347-54. doi: 10.1185/030079905X56556.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Epoetin alfa (EPO) and darbepoetin alfa (DARB) are approved for the treatment of chemotherapy-related anemia (CRA) in patients with nonmyeloid malignancies. This study examined dosing and hematologic outcomes with these agents in community oncology clinics.

METHODS

Medical charts were abstracted retrospectively for 1005 patients (527 EPO, 478 DARB) with CRA (hemoglobin [Hb] < or = 11 g/dL) who received EPO or DARB at 10 U.S. oncology clinics between January 2002 and March 2003.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Outcome measures included dose and frequency of erythropoietic therapy, change in Hb at 4, 8, and 12 weeks after initiation of therapy, and transfusion of packed red blood cells.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were generally similar between groups. Most EPO-treated patients received EPO once weekly, but 25% received EPO every 2-3 weeks, with 40,000 U the predominant dose. DARB was usually given every 1-2 weeks in doses ranging from 200-400 mcg/injection. Mean treatment duration was relatively short (< 8 weeks) in both groups, with a similar number of Hb determinations and similar incidence of red blood transfusion between groups. Hb increased from baseline in the EPO and DARB groups at 4 weeks (0.99 vs. 0.69 g/dL, p = 0.003), 8 weeks (1.39 vs. 1.06 g/dL, p = 0.011), and 12 weeks (1.43 vs. 1.11 g/dL, p = 0.055). Early Hb response (> or = 1 g/dL increase by 4 weeks) was more common with EPO than DARB (48% vs. 38%, p = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

EPO was superior to DARB for early hematologic outcomes in patients with CRA in community oncology clinics. Retrospective data collection and relative inexperience with DARB at the time of the study may limit the generalization of these results. Randomized, controlled trials comparing EPO and DARB are warranted.

摘要

目的

促红细胞生成素α(EPO)和达比加群酯(DARB)已被批准用于治疗非髓系恶性肿瘤患者的化疗相关性贫血(CRA)。本研究在社区肿瘤诊所中检测了这些药物的给药剂量和血液学结果。

方法

回顾性提取了2002年1月至2003年3月期间在美国10家肿瘤诊所接受EPO或DARB治疗的1005例CRA患者(血红蛋白[Hb]≤11g/dL)的病历(527例使用EPO,478例使用DARB)。

主要观察指标

观察指标包括促红细胞生成治疗的剂量和频率、治疗开始后4周、8周和12周时Hb的变化以及浓缩红细胞的输注情况。

结果

两组患者的基线特征总体相似。大多数接受EPO治疗的患者每周接受一次EPO,但25%的患者每2 - 3周接受一次EPO,主要剂量为40000U。DARB通常每1 - 2周给药一次,每次剂量为200 - 400μg。两组的平均治疗持续时间相对较短(<8周),两组之间的Hb测定次数和红细胞输血发生率相似。EPO组和DARB组的Hb在4周时从基线水平升高(0.99 vs. 0.69g/dL,p = 0.003),8周时(1.39 vs. 1.06g/dL,p = 0.011),12周时(1.43 vs. 1.11g/dL,p = 0.055)。EPO组早期Hb反应(4周时Hb升高≥1g/dL)比DARB组更常见(48% vs. 38%,p = 0.008)。

结论

在社区肿瘤诊所中,对于CRA患者,EPO在早期血液学结果方面优于DARB。回顾性数据收集以及研究时对DARB相对缺乏经验可能会限制这些结果的推广。有必要进行比较EPO和DARB的随机对照试验。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验