Hulsey T C, Pittard W B, Ebeling M
Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston 29425-3313.
J S C Med Assoc. 1991 Dec;87(12):581-4.
Changes in both the location of very low birth weight births and in the number of infants selected for transport were chosen for the evaluation of regionalized perinatal care and its effectiveness in the Lowcountry Perinatal catchment area. The four-year period reviewed was characterized by the initiation of a well-defined regionalized perinatal transport program at the Medical University of South Carolina. In conjunction with this increased availability of transport, there was a statistically significant (p less than 0.02) increase in the number of VLBW neonates transported to MUSC after being delivered in community hospitals. This increase was accompanied by an increase in the proportion of infants referred for transport within the first hour of life. Among those neonates referred within the first four hours of life, survival was inversely proportional to the infant's age when the transport team arrived, suggesting that a rapid response by the neonatal transport team was associated with a significantly increased VLBW infant survival. Among all transported infants, in-utero continues to be the most efficacious means of transport for VLBW infants and that delivery of VLBW infants at regional medical centers continues to result in the most optimal survival.
极低出生体重儿出生地点的变化以及被选作转运的婴儿数量的变化,被用于评估低地围产期服务区域化及其在低地围产期服务区域的成效。回顾的四年期间的特点是,南卡罗来纳医科大学启动了一项明确界定的区域化围产期转运计划。随着转运服务的增加,在社区医院分娩后被转运至南卡罗来纳医科大学的极低出生体重儿数量有统计学显著增加(p小于0.02)。这一增加伴随着出生后一小时内被转诊转运的婴儿比例上升。在出生后四小时内被转诊的新生儿中,存活率与转运团队到达时婴儿的年龄呈反比,这表明新生儿转运团队的快速反应与极低出生体重儿存活率显著提高相关。在所有转运的婴儿中,子宫内转运仍然是极低出生体重儿最有效的转运方式,并且在区域医疗中心分娩极低出生体重儿仍然能带来最佳存活率。