The Floating Hospital for Children at Tufts Medical Center, Department of Pediatrics, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.
James M Anderson Center for Health Systems Excellence, Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio.
J Hosp Med. 2019 Nov 1;14(11):694-703. doi: 10.12788/jhm.3268. Epub 2019 Sep 18.
Although the majority of children are hospitalized in nonchildren's hospitals, little is known about the quality and safety of pediatric care in community hospitals.
The aim of this study was to conduct a scoping review and synthesize literature on the quality and safety of pediatric inpatient care in United States community hospitals.
We performed a systematic literature search in October 2016 to identify pediatric studies that reported on safety, effectiveness, efficiency, timeliness, patient-centeredness, or equity set in general, nonuniversity, or nonchildren's hospitals. We extracted data on study design, patient descriptors, and quality outcomes and assessed the risk of bias using modified Newcastle-Ottawa Scales.
A total of 44 articles met the inclusion criteria. Study designs, patient populations, and quality outcome measures were heterogeneous; only three clinical domains, (1) perinatal regionalization, (2) telemedicine, and (3) imaging radiation, were explored in multiple studies with consistent directionality of results. A total of 30 studies were observational, and 22 studies compared community hospital quality outcomes with other hospital types. The remaining 14 studies reported testing of interventions; 12 showed improved quality of care postintervention. All studies reported an outcome addressing safety, effectiveness, or efficiency, whereas timeliness, patient-centeredness, and equity were infrequently addressed. Risk of bias was moderate or high for 72% of studies.
Literature on the inpatient care of children in community hospitals is limited, making it difficult to evaluate healthcare quality. Measures of timeliness, patient-centeredness, and equity are underrepresented. The field would benefit from more multicenter collaborations to facilitate the application of robust study designs and to enable a systematic assessment of individual interventions and community hospital quality outcomes.
尽管大多数儿童在非儿童医院住院治疗,但对于社区医院儿科护理的质量和安全性却知之甚少。
本研究旨在对美国社区医院儿科住院患者护理质量和安全性进行系统评价综述,以总结相关文献。
我们于 2016 年 10 月进行了系统文献检索,以确定报告安全性、有效性、效率、及时性、以患者为中心或公平性的儿科研究,这些研究设定在一般、非大学或非儿童医院。我们提取了关于研究设计、患者特征和质量结果的数据,并使用改良的纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表评估偏倚风险。
共有 44 篇文章符合纳入标准。研究设计、患者人群和质量结果测量指标均存在异质性;只有三个临床领域(1)围产期区域化、(2)远程医疗和(3)影像学辐射,在多项具有一致结果方向性的研究中进行了探讨。30 项研究为观察性研究,22 项研究将社区医院的质量结果与其他医院类型进行了比较。其余 14 项研究报告了干预措施的测试;12 项研究显示干预后护理质量得到改善。所有研究均报告了一项针对安全性、有效性或效率的结果,而及时性、以患者为中心和公平性则很少涉及。72%的研究存在中度或高度偏倚风险。
社区医院儿童住院治疗相关文献有限,难以评估医疗质量。及时性、以患者为中心和公平性的衡量标准较少。该领域将受益于更多的多中心合作,以促进应用稳健的研究设计,并能够系统评估个别干预措施和社区医院的质量结果。