Suppr超能文献

使用HIV抑制剂作为杀菌剂进行体外暴露前和暴露后预防,以对抗游离或细胞相关的HIV-1感染。

In vitro pre- and post-exposure prophylaxis using HIV inhibitors as microbicides against cell-free or cell-associated HIV-1 infection.

作者信息

Terrazas-Aranda Katty, Van Herrewege Yven, Lewi Paul J, Van Roey Jens, Vanham Guido

机构信息

Virology Unit, Department of Microbiology, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.

出版信息

Antivir Chem Chemother. 2007;18(3):141-51. doi: 10.1177/095632020701800304.

Abstract

Several classes of microbicides are being evaluated for the prevention of sexual HIV transmission. In vivo, the infectious dose and viral source involved in transmission remain uncertain and it is likely that women will use microbicides both before and after high-risk HIV exposure. Therefore, we evaluated HIV entry inhibitors (EIs) and reverse transcriptase inhibitors (RTIs) for their ability to block cell-free and cell-associated HIV-1 infection in co-cultures of monocyte-derived dendritic cells (MO-DC) and CD4+ T-cells using settings of pre- and post-exposure prophylaxis. In the pre-exposure assay, where compound was present before, during and 24 h after infection, all tested EIs (BMS806, TAK779 and T20) and RTIs (PMPA, TMC120 and UC781) blocked infection with 10(-4) multiplicity of infection (MOI) of cell-free virus at a dose between 100 and 10,000 nM, dependent on the compound used. At 10(-3) MOI, however, only T20 and the RTIs completely blocked infection. Furthermore, in experiments with cell-associated virus, EIs were ineffective, whereas RTIs actively blocked infection with similar potency as in the experiments with cell-free virus. In the post-exposure assay, where compound was added 2 h after infection and remained present for 24 h, EIs were inactive whereas RTIs blocked cell-free and cell-associated viral infections equally efficiently. Moreover, post-exposure prophylaxis initiated 24 h after infection with cell-free or cell-associated HIV-1 was still effective with 1,000 nM of TMC120. Both EIs and RTIs were non-cytotoxic at any tested concentration for MO-DC and CD4+ T-cells in co-culture. Our study shows that RTIs are potent inhibitors of cell-free and cell-associated virus used either in pre- or post-exposure settings. It highlights that parameters such as viral input, viral source, the time of compound addition and the target cells should be considered in microbicides evaluation.

摘要

目前正在对几类杀微生物剂进行评估,以预防艾滋病毒的性传播。在体内,传播过程中涉及的感染剂量和病毒来源仍不确定,而且女性很可能在艾滋病毒高危暴露之前和之后都使用杀微生物剂。因此,我们利用暴露前和暴露后预防的设置,评估了艾滋病毒进入抑制剂(EIs)和逆转录酶抑制剂(RTIs)在单核细胞衍生树突状细胞(MO-DC)和CD4+ T细胞共培养物中阻断游离型和细胞相关型HIV-1感染的能力。在暴露前试验中,即在感染前、感染期间和感染后24小时存在化合物的情况下,所有测试的进入抑制剂(BMS806、TAK779和T20)和逆转录酶抑制剂(替诺福韦、TMC120和UC781)在100至10000 nM的剂量下,均可阻断游离病毒10^(-4)感染复数(MOI)的感染,具体取决于所使用的化合物。然而,在10^(-3) MOI时,只有T20和逆转录酶抑制剂能完全阻断感染。此外,在细胞相关病毒的实验中,进入抑制剂无效,而逆转录酶抑制剂能像在游离病毒实验中一样有效地积极阻断感染。在暴露后试验中,即在感染后2小时加入化合物并持续存在24小时的情况下,进入抑制剂无活性,而逆转录酶抑制剂能同样有效地阻断游离型和细胞相关型病毒感染。此外,在感染游离型或细胞相关型HIV-1 24小时后开始的暴露后预防,使用1000 nM的TMC120仍然有效。在共培养中,对于MO-DC和CD4+ T细胞,进入抑制剂和逆转录酶抑制剂在任何测试浓度下均无细胞毒性。我们的研究表明,逆转录酶抑制剂在暴露前或暴露后设置中都是游离型和细胞相关型病毒的有效抑制剂。该研究强调,在杀微生物剂评估中应考虑病毒输入、病毒来源、化合物添加时间和靶细胞等参数。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验