Marijanovic Zrinka, Ragimbeau Josiane, van der Heyden José, Uzé Gilles, Pellegrini Sandra
Unité de Signalisation des Cytokines, CNRS URA 1961, Institut Pasteur, 25 rue du Docteur Roux, Paris 75724.
Biochem J. 2007 Oct 1;407(1):141-51. doi: 10.1042/BJ20070605.
Type I IFNs (interferons) (IFNalpha/beta) form a family of related cytokines that control a variety of cellular functions through binding to a receptor composed of IFNAR (IFNalpha receptor subunit) 1 and 2. Among type I IFNs, the alpha2 and beta subtypes exhibit a large difference in their binding affinities to IFNAR1, and it was suggested that high concentrations of IFNAR1 may compensate for its low intrinsic binding affinity for IFNalpha2. We tested whether receptor-proximal signalling events are sensitive to IFNAR1 surface concentration by investigating the relationship between relative IFNAR1/IFNAR2 surface levels and IFNalpha2 and IFNbeta signalling potencies in several cell lines. For this, we monitored the activation profile of JAK (Janus kinase)/STAT (signal transducer and activator of transcription) proteins, measured basal and ligand-induced surface decay of each receptor subunit and tested the effect of variable IFNAR1 levels on IFNalpha2 signalling potency. Our data show that the cell-surface IFNAR1 level is indeed a limiting factor for assembly of the functional complex, but an increased concentration of it does not translate into an IFNalpha/beta differential JAK/STAT signalling nor does it change the dynamics of the engaged receptor. Importantly, however, our data highlight a differential effect upon routing of IFNAR2. Following binding of IFNalpha2, IFNAR2 is internalized, but, instead of being routed towards degradation as it is when complexed to IFNbeta, it recycles back to the cell surface. These observations suggest strongly that the stability and the intracellular lifetime of the ternary complex account for the differential control of IFNAR2. Moreover, the present study opens up the attractive possibility that endosomal-initiated signalling may contribute to IFNalpha/beta differential bioactivities.
I型干扰素(IFN)(IFNα/β)构成了一个相关细胞因子家族,它们通过与由IFNAR(IFNα受体亚基)1和2组成的受体结合来控制多种细胞功能。在I型干扰素中,α2和β亚型对IFNAR1的结合亲和力存在很大差异,有人提出高浓度的IFNAR1可能弥补其对IFNα2的低内在结合亲和力。我们通过研究几种细胞系中相对IFNAR1/IFNAR2表面水平与IFNα2和IFNβ信号传导能力之间的关系,测试了受体近端信号事件是否对IFNAR1表面浓度敏感。为此,我们监测了JAK(Janus激酶)/STAT(信号转导和转录激活因子)蛋白的激活情况,测量了每个受体亚基的基础和配体诱导的表面降解,并测试了不同IFNAR1水平对IFNα2信号传导能力的影响。我们的数据表明,细胞表面IFNAR1水平确实是功能复合物组装的限制因素,但它浓度的增加并不会转化为IFNα/β差异性的JAK/STAT信号传导,也不会改变结合受体的动力学。然而,重要的是,我们的数据突出了对IFNAR2转运的差异性影响。IFNα2结合后,IFNAR2会被内化,但与它与IFNβ结合时不同,它不会被导向降解,而是循环回到细胞表面。这些观察结果强烈表明,三元复合物的稳定性和细胞内寿命是IFNAR2差异性控制的原因。此外,本研究揭示了一个有吸引力的可能性,即内体启动的信号传导可能有助于IFNα/β的差异性生物活性。