Suppr超能文献

一般健康问卷用于疼痛门诊患者精神疾病一级筛查的效度。

The validity of the General Health Questionnaire for first-stage screening for mental illness in pain clinic patients.

作者信息

Benjamin Sidney, Lennon Sean, Gardner Gail

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester M13 9WL U.K. Department of Psychiatry, University Hospital of South Manchester, Manchester M20 8LE U.K. Department of Occupational Therapy, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester M13 9WL U.K.

出版信息

Pain. 1991 Nov;47(2):197-202. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(91)90205-C.

Abstract

The validity of the 28-item version of the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-28) was determined by comparison with the Clinical Interview Schedule (CIS) in 56 pain clinic patients. Despite some limitations, the GHQ can be used effectively and cheaply as the first stage of an assessment to identify potential "cases" of mental disorder which must then be verified using a second-stage clinical interview such as the CIS. This process can result in a considerable reduction in the proportion of patients requiring a psychiatric interview and, therefore, in reduced service costs. Factors associated with lower validity coefficients include female sex, age above 60 years and pain with a duration of less than 2 years.

摘要

通过与临床访谈表(CIS)对比,在56名疼痛门诊患者中确定了一般健康问卷28项版本(GHQ - 28)的效度。尽管存在一些局限性,但GHQ可作为评估的第一阶段有效且低成本地使用,以识别精神障碍的潜在“病例”,然后必须使用第二阶段的临床访谈(如CIS)进行核实。这一过程可使需要精神科访谈的患者比例大幅降低,从而降低服务成本。效度系数较低的相关因素包括女性、60岁以上年龄以及病程少于2年的疼痛。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验