• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

1991年肿瘤护理学会研究重点调查

1991 Oncology Nursing Society Research Priorities Survey.

作者信息

Mooney K H, Ferrell B R, Nail L M, Benedict S C, Haberman M R

机构信息

Parent-Child and Adult Nursing Division, University of Utah College of Nursing, Salt Lake City.

出版信息

Oncol Nurs Forum. 1991 Nov-Dec;18(8):1381-8.

PMID:1762979
Abstract

Documenting current research priorities is an ongoing process that is important to furthering the research agenda of oncology nursing. The purpose of this study was to update and partially replicate previous Oncology Nursing Society (ONS) research priorities surveys. Questionnaires were sent to a convenience sample of 429 ONS members involved in research or in ONS leadership. The response rate was 70% (N = 310). Respondents identified a combination of clinical problems, research issues, and cancer care economic factors among their top 10 research priorities. Quality of life and symptom management consistently were ranked as the highest priority items across all three methods used to rank-order the items. Respondents also provided suggestions for future ONS/Oncology Nursing Foundation small grants and for expansion of current ONS research activities. These findings provide direction for the focus of oncology nursing research by suggesting topics for research, by identifying areas that require additional research funding, by recommending new research activities for ONS, and by promoting research as the basis for oncology nursing practice.

摘要

记录当前的研究重点是一个持续的过程,这对于推进肿瘤护理的研究议程至关重要。本研究的目的是更新并部分重复先前肿瘤护理学会(ONS)的研究重点调查。问卷被发送给429名参与研究或担任ONS领导职务的ONS成员组成的便利样本。回复率为70%(N = 310)。受访者在其前10项研究重点中确定了临床问题、研究问题和癌症护理经济因素的组合。在用于对项目进行排序的所有三种方法中,生活质量和症状管理一直被列为最高优先级项目。受访者还为ONS/肿瘤护理基金会未来的小额赠款以及当前ONS研究活动的扩展提供了建议。这些发现通过提出研究主题、确定需要额外研究资金的领域、为ONS推荐新的研究活动以及促进将研究作为肿瘤护理实践的基础,为肿瘤护理研究的重点提供了方向。

相似文献

1
1991 Oncology Nursing Society Research Priorities Survey.1991年肿瘤护理学会研究重点调查
Oncol Nurs Forum. 1991 Nov-Dec;18(8):1381-8.
2
1994 Oncology Nursing Society Research Priorities Survey.1994年肿瘤护理学会研究重点调查
Oncol Nurs Forum. 1995 Jun;22(5):785-9.
3
Year 2000 Oncology Nursing Society Research Priorities Survey.2000年肿瘤护理学会研究重点调查
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2002 Apr;29(3):481-91. doi: 10.1188/02.ONF.481-491.
4
Advanced practice issues: results of the ONS Advanced Practice Nursing survey.高级实践问题:肿瘤护理学会高级实践护理调查结果
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2001 Nov-Dec;28(10):1521-30.
5
Priority ethical issues in oncology nursing: current approaches and future directions.肿瘤护理中的优先伦理问题:当前方法与未来方向。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 1995 Jun;22(5):803-7.
6
1988 ONS survey of research priorities.1988年国家统计局研究重点调查
Oncol Nurs Forum. 1989 May-Jun;16(3):413-6.
7
Delphi survey of nursing research priorities.护理研究重点的德尔菲调查
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2004 Sep 17;31(5):1011-8. doi: 10.1188/04.ONF.1011-1018. Print 2004 Sep.
8
Oncology Nursing Society year 2004 research priorities survey.肿瘤护理协会2004年研究重点调查
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2005 Mar 5;32(2):281-90. doi: 10.1188/05.ONF.281-290.
9
Learning needs of Oncology Nursing Society members.肿瘤护理学会成员的学习需求。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 1990 Sep-Oct;17(5):697-703.
10
Oncology nurses' perceptions of obstacles and supportive behaviors at the end of life.肿瘤专科护士对临终阶段障碍及支持性行为的看法。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 2009 Jul;36(4):446-53. doi: 10.1188/09.ONF.446-453.

引用本文的文献

1
Classical test theory and item response theory/Rasch model to assess differences between patient-reported fatigue using 7-day and 4-week recall periods.经典测试理论和项目反应理论/拉施模型,用于评估使用7天和4周回忆期报告的患者疲劳之间的差异。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2009 Sep;62(9):991-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.10.007. Epub 2009 Feb 12.
2
Item banking to improve, shorten and computerize self-reported fatigue: an illustration of steps to create a core item bank from the FACIT-Fatigue Scale.用于改善、缩短并使自我报告的疲劳情况计算机化的题库建设:以从FACIT疲劳量表创建核心题库的步骤为例
Qual Life Res. 2003 Aug;12(5):485-501. doi: 10.1023/a:1025014509626.