Covic Tanya, Pallant Julie F, Conaghan Philip G, Tennant Alan
School of Psychology, University of Western Sydney, Penrith South DC, NSW, Australia.
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007 Jul 13;5:41. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-5-41.
The aim of this study was to test the internal validity of the total Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression (CES-D) scale using Rasch analysis in a rheumatoid arthritis (RA) population.
CES-D was administered to 157 patients with RA over three time points within a 12 month period. Rasch analysis was applied using RUMM2020 software to assess the overall fit of the model, the response scale used, individual item fit, differential item functioning (DIF) and person separation.
Pooled data across three time points was shown to fit the Rasch model with removal of seven items from the original 20-item CES-D scale. It was necessary to rescore the response format from four to three categories in order to improve the scale's fit. Two items demonstrated some DIF for age and gender but were retained within the 13-item CES-D scale. A new cut point for depression score of 9 was found to correspond to the original cut point score of 16 in the full CES-D scale.
This Rasch analysis of the CES-D in a longstanding RA cohort resulted in the construction of a modified 13-item scale with good internal validity. Further validation of the modified scale is recommended particularly in relation to the new cut point for depression.
本研究旨在使用拉施分析来检验流行病学研究中心抑郁量表(CES-D)总表在类风湿关节炎(RA)人群中的内部效度。
在12个月内的三个时间点,对157例RA患者进行CES-D评估。使用RUMM2020软件进行拉施分析,以评估模型的整体拟合度、所用的反应量表、单个项目的拟合度、项目功能差异(DIF)和人员区分度。
三个时间点的汇总数据显示,在从最初的20项CES-D量表中删除7个项目后,数据符合拉施模型。为了提高量表的拟合度,有必要将反应格式从四类重新评分至三类。有两个项目在年龄和性别方面表现出一定的DIF,但仍保留在13项CES-D量表中。发现抑郁评分的新切点为9,与完整CES-D量表中原来的切点分数16相对应。
对长期RA队列中的CES-D进行的这项拉施分析,构建了一个具有良好内部效度的改良13项量表。建议对改良量表进行进一步验证,尤其是关于抑郁的新切点。