Henn Julian, Leusser Dirk, Stalke Dietmar
Georg August Universität Göttingen, Institut für Anorganische Chemie, Tammannstrasse 4, 37077 Göttingen, Germany.
J Comput Chem. 2007 Nov 15;28(14):2317-24. doi: 10.1002/jcc.20747.
In this study, the two small molecules HS(CH)(CH(2)), 1, and F(CH)(4)F, 2, are presented, which yield different chemical interpretations when one and the same density is interpreted either by means of Natural Bond Orbital and subsequent Natural Resonance Theory application or by the Quantum Theory of Atoms In Molecules. The first exhibits a S-C bond in the orbital based approach, whereas the density based Quantum Theory of Atoms In Molecules detects no corresponding bond. In F(CH)(4)F a F...F bond is detected in the density based approach, whereas in the orbital based approach no corresponding bond is found. Geometrical reasons for the presence of unexpected and the absence of expected bond critical points are discussed.
在本研究中,展示了两个小分子HS(CH)(CH(2))(1)和F(CH)(4)F(2),当使用自然键轨道并随后应用自然共振理论或通过分子中的原子量子理论对同一密度进行解释时,会产生不同的化学解释。在基于轨道的方法中,第一个分子显示出一个S-C键,而基于密度的分子中的原子量子理论未检测到相应的键。在F(CH)(4)F中,基于密度的方法检测到一个F...F键,而在基于轨道的方法中未发现相应的键。讨论了出现意外键临界点和未出现预期键临界点的几何原因。