Jacobsen Heiko
KemKom, Libellenweg 2, 25917 Leck, Nordfriesland, Germany.
J Comput Chem. 2009 May;30(7):1093-102. doi: 10.1002/jcc.21135.
Stalke's dilemma, stating that different chemical interpretations are obtained when one and the same density is interpreted either by means of natural bond orbital (NBO) and subsequent natural resonance theory (NRT) application or by the quantum theory of atoms in molecules (QTAIM), is reinvestigated. It is shown that within the framework of QTAIM, the question as to whether for a given molecule two atoms are bonded or not is only meaningful in the context of a well-defined reference geometry. The localized-orbital-locator (LOL) is applied to map out patterns in covalent bonding interaction, and produces results that are consistent for a variety of reference geometries. Furthermore, LOL interpretations are in accord with NBO/NRT, and assist in an interpretation in terms of covalent bonding.
重新研究了施塔尔克困境,该困境指出,当通过自然键轨道(NBO)及随后的自然共振理论(NRT)应用或分子中原子的量子理论(QTAIM)对同一密度进行解释时,会得到不同的化学解释。结果表明,在QTAIM框架内,对于给定分子中两个原子是否成键的问题,只有在明确的参考几何结构背景下才有意义。应用定域轨道定位器(LOL)来描绘共价键相互作用的模式,并得出了与各种参考几何结构一致的结果。此外,LOL解释与NBO/NRT一致,并有助于从共价键角度进行解释。