Luo Xian-rong, Zeng Guo-bing, Liu Shu-ren, Ren Chang-fa, Yu Zhou-yao
Centre of Liver Diseases, 458th Hospital of PLA, Guangzhou 510602, Guangdong, China.
Zhongguo Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2007 Jul;19(7):404-7.
To determine the impact of adaptive positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) and mechanical ventilation on hemodynamics and oxygen kinetics in post-liver transplantation patients.
The study included 11 patients who accepted mechanical ventilation after piggyback liver transplantation. Swan-Ganz catheter and radial artery catheter were used to monitor the cardiac output (CO), mean pulmonary arterial pressure (MPAP), mean arterial blood pressure (MABP) and central venous pressure (CVP) and airway pressure. After transplantation, PEEP of 0, 5, 10 and 15 cm H(2)O (1 cm H(2)O=0.098 kPa) was instituted to support the ventilation alternately. After 30 minutes, pressure regulated volume controlled ventilation (PRVCV) and pressure controlled synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation+pressure support ventilation (PC-SIMV+PSV) were used to support the ventilation alternately and the indexes of hemodynamics and oxygen kinetics were analyzed.
The data showed that differences existed in peak airway pressure, mean airway pressure, CVP and MPAP when different levels of PEEP were used. These indexes were significantly higher in PEEP of 15 and 10 cm H(2)O than those in PEEP of 0 and 5 cm H(2)O.There were no differences in pH, partial pressure of carbon dioxide in arterial blood (PaCO(2)), pressure of oxygen in arterial blood (PaO(2)), arterial oxygen saturation (SaO(2)), oxygen delivery (DO(2)), oxygen consumption (VO(2)) and oxygen extraction rate (O(2)ER) at different levels of PEEP. The airway pressure was significantly lower under PRVCV pattern than those under PC-SIMV+PSV pattern [(8.78+/-1.53) cm H(2)O vs. (11.64+/-3.30) cm H(2)O, P<0.05]. There were no differences in other indexes between these two mechanical ventilation patterns.
These date suggested that a low level of PEEP (5 cm H(2)O) during mechanical ventilation should be used in post-liver transplantation patients in order to decrease the influence of PEEP on systemic circulation and hepatic regurgitation. PRVCV could be a more suitable mechanical ventilation pattern for patient after liver transplantation.
确定适应性呼气末正压(PEEP)和机械通气对肝移植术后患者血流动力学和氧动力学的影响。
该研究纳入了11例背驮式肝移植术后接受机械通气的患者。使用 Swan-Ganz 导管和桡动脉导管监测心输出量(CO)、平均肺动脉压(MPAP)、平均动脉血压(MABP)、中心静脉压(CVP)和气道压力。移植后,依次采用0、5、10和15 cm H₂O(1 cm H₂O = 0.098 kPa)的PEEP交替支持通气。30分钟后,交替采用压力调节容量控制通气(PRVCV)和压力控制同步间歇强制通气+压力支持通气(PC-SIMV+PSV)支持通气,并分析血流动力学和氧动力学指标。
数据显示,使用不同水平的PEEP时,气道峰压、平均气道压、CVP和MPAP存在差异。15和10 cm H₂O的PEEP时这些指标显著高于0和5 cm H₂O的PEEP。不同水平PEEP下的pH、动脉血二氧化碳分压(PaCO₂)、动脉血氧分压(PaO₂)、动脉血氧饱和度(SaO₂)、氧输送(DO₂)、氧消耗(VO₂)和氧摄取率(O₂ER)无差异。PRVCV模式下的气道压力显著低于PC-SIMV+PSV模式下的气道压力[(8.78±1.53)cm H₂O对(11.64±3.30)cm H₂O,P<0.05]。这两种机械通气模式下的其他指标无差异。
这些数据表明,肝移植术后患者机械通气时应采用低水平PEEP(5 cm H₂O),以降低PEEP对体循环和肝反流的影响。PRVCV可能是肝移植术后患者更合适的机械通气模式。