Jameson K, Averley P A, Shackley P, Steele J
Department of Economics and Related Studies, University of York.
Br Dent J. 2007 Sep 22;203(6):E13. doi: 10.1038/bdj.2007.631. Epub 2007 Jul 13.
To compare the cost-effectiveness of dental sedation techniques used in the treatment of children, focusing on hospital-based dental general anaesthetic (DGA) and advanced conscious sedation in a controlled primary care environment.
Data on fees, costs and treatment pathways were obtained from a primary care clinic specialising in advanced sedation techniques. For the hospital-based DGA cohort, data were gathered from hospital trusts in the same area. Comparison was via an average cost per child treated and subsequent sensitivity analysis.
Analysing records spanning one year, the average cost per child treated via advanced conscious sedation was pound245.47. As some treatments fail (3.5% of cases attempted), and the technique is not deemed suitable for all patients (4-5%), DGA is still required and has been factored into this cost. DGA has an average cost per case treated of pound359.91, 46.6% more expensive than advanced conscious sedation. These cost savings were robust to plausible variation in all parameters.
The costs of advanced conscious sedation techniques, applied in a controlled primary care environment, are substantially lower than the equivalent costs of hospital-based DGA, informing the debate about the optimum way of managing this patient group.
比较用于儿童治疗的牙科镇静技术的成本效益,重点关注以医院为基础的牙科全身麻醉(DGA)和在可控的初级保健环境中的深度镇静。
从一家专门从事深度镇静技术的初级保健诊所获取费用、成本和治疗途径的数据。对于以医院为基础的DGA队列,数据从同一地区的医院信托机构收集。通过每个接受治疗儿童的平均成本及后续敏感性分析进行比较。
分析一年的记录,通过深度镇静治疗的每个儿童的平均成本为245.47英镑。由于一些治疗会失败(尝试病例的3.5%),且该技术并不适用于所有患者(4-5%),仍需要DGA,并已计入该成本。DGA每例治疗的平均成本为359.91英镑,比深度镇静贵46.6%。这些成本节省在所有参数的合理变化范围内都很稳健。
在可控的初级保健环境中应用的深度镇静技术的成本大大低于以医院为基础的DGA的等效成本,为关于管理该患者群体的最佳方式的辩论提供了依据。