评估乳牙龋病传统及生物修复治疗方法的成功率：一项研究。
Evaluation of the Success of Conventional and Biological Restorative Treatment Approaches for Caries in Primary Molars: An Study.
作者信息
Undre Maryam I, Chunawala Yusuf, Choubey Shikha, Shaikh Maheen N, Ershad Aliya, Qureshi Sana
机构信息
Department of Dentistry, Masina Hospital, Byculla, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India.
Department of Pediatric & Preventive Dentistry, MA Rangoonwala College of Dental Sciences and Research Centre, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
出版信息
Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2023 Jul-Aug;16(4):591-597. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-2644.
BACKGROUND
In order to compare the clinical and radiographic success of three treatment modalities-conventional restoration (CR), nonrestorative caries treatment (NRCT), and Hall technique (HT), with a 3-month to 1 year follow-up in deciduous molars with occlusal or proximal carious lesions.
DESIGN
Children between the ages of 5 and 8 were chosen for the study, having a total of 120 teeth. They were split into three groups, each with 40 participants-CR, HT, and NRCT. Clinical and radiographic evaluation was done at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. Data were statistically analyzed.
RESULTS
The Chi-squared value and -value were found to be insignificant when comparing clinical and radiographic ratings of all three groups at 3, 6, 9, and 12-month intervals.
CONCLUSION
Hall technique (HT) performed better than CR. NRCT was more acceptable to patients than CR.
HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE
Undre MI, Chunawala Y, Choubey S, Evaluation of the Success of Conventional and Biological Restorative Treatment Approaches for Caries in Primary Molars: An Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2023;16(4):591-597.
背景
为比较三种治疗方式——传统修复（CR）、非修复性龋病治疗（NRCT）和霍尔技术（HT）——在患有咬合面或邻面龋损的乳牙中的临床和影像学成功率，并进行3个月至1年的随访。
设计
选择5至8岁的儿童进行研究，共有120颗牙齿。他们被分为三组，每组40名参与者——CR组、HT组和NRCT组。在3、6、9和12个月时进行临床和影像学评估。对数据进行统计学分析。
结果
在3、6、9和12个月的时间间隔内比较所有三组的临床和影像学评分时，发现卡方值和P值无统计学意义。
结论
霍尔技术（HT）的表现优于CR。NRCT比CR更易被患者接受。
如何引用本文
Undre MI, Chunawala Y, Choubey S, 乳牙龋病传统与生物修复治疗方法成功率的评估：一项研究。《国际临床儿科牙科杂志》2023；16(4):591 - 597。
Zotero 插件