Caces F, Braccini F
Centre Hospitalier de Villefranche de Rouergue, Unité d'ORL et Chirurgie Cervico-Faciale, 12200 Villefranche de Rouergue, France.
Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord). 2007;128(1-2):47-53.
For surgery of otosclerosis, broughting to the fore interest of crossing informations achieved by using AAO-HNS guidelines for conductive hearing loss and Glasgow Benefit Plot (GBP). Secondary aim: compare stapedotomy with and without veinous interposition. INSTITUTIONS: Referential otologic center in semi-country-side general hospital and private institution in urban zone.
retrospective bi-centric study comparing 129 cases of primary surgery for otosclerosis between 1998 and 2004. 3 groups: stapedotomy without veinous interposition (92 cases), stapedotomy with veinous interposition (27 cases), stapedectomy (10 cases). Results given following AAO-HNS guidelines and GBP.
variance analysis test and t-Student test (p < 0,05), graphic analysis of inter-aural difference before and after surgery.
Main benefit in air conduction (AC) threshold is 23 to 25 dB, no statistical difference between both techniques of stapedotomy. Stapedotomy gives better results than stapedectomy in this serie. Stereophony is achieved in 75% of overall cases with stapedotomy but normal hearing is achieved in only 53% of unilateral pre operative hearing loss.
Stapedotomy is a more effective technique in this serie. Crossing informations achieved using AAO-HNS guidelines and GBP leads to give a more realistic and comprehensive understanding to patients who will undergo surgery for otosclerosis.
对于耳硬化症手术,突出使用美国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学会(AAO - HNS)关于传导性听力损失的指南和格拉斯哥获益图(GBP)所获得的交叉信息的重要性。次要目的:比较有无静脉植入的镫骨切除术。机构:半乡村综合医院的参考耳科中心和市区的私立机构。
一项回顾性双中心研究,比较了1998年至2004年间129例耳硬化症初次手术病例。分为3组:无静脉植入的镫骨切除术(92例)、有静脉植入的镫骨切除术(27例)、镫骨足板切除术(10例)。结果依据AAO - HNS指南和GBP给出。
方差分析检验和t检验(p < 0.05),对手术前后耳间差异进行图形分析。
气导(AC)阈值的主要获益为23至25分贝,两种镫骨切除技术之间无统计学差异。在本系列中,镫骨切除术的效果优于镫骨足板切除术。镫骨切除术总体病例中有75%实现了立体声,但术前单侧听力损失的病例中只有53%恢复到正常听力。
在本系列中,镫骨切除术是一种更有效的技术。使用AAO - HNS指南和GBP获得的交叉信息能让即将接受耳硬化症手术的患者有更现实和全面的了解。