Suppr超能文献

[使用美国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学会(AAO-HNS)传导性听力损失指南及格拉斯哥获益图对耳硬化症镫骨手术结果进行的比较研究:129例病例的结果]

[Comparative study using AAO-HNS guidelines for conductive hearing loss and Glasgow Benefit Plot to evaluate results of stapes surgery for otosclerosis: results of 129 cases].

作者信息

Caces F, Braccini F

机构信息

Centre Hospitalier de Villefranche de Rouergue, Unité d'ORL et Chirurgie Cervico-Faciale, 12200 Villefranche de Rouergue, France.

出版信息

Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord). 2007;128(1-2):47-53.

Abstract

AIM OF THE STUDY

For surgery of otosclerosis, broughting to the fore interest of crossing informations achieved by using AAO-HNS guidelines for conductive hearing loss and Glasgow Benefit Plot (GBP). Secondary aim: compare stapedotomy with and without veinous interposition. INSTITUTIONS: Referential otologic center in semi-country-side general hospital and private institution in urban zone.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

retrospective bi-centric study comparing 129 cases of primary surgery for otosclerosis between 1998 and 2004. 3 groups: stapedotomy without veinous interposition (92 cases), stapedotomy with veinous interposition (27 cases), stapedectomy (10 cases). Results given following AAO-HNS guidelines and GBP.

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED

variance analysis test and t-Student test (p < 0,05), graphic analysis of inter-aural difference before and after surgery.

RESULTS

Main benefit in air conduction (AC) threshold is 23 to 25 dB, no statistical difference between both techniques of stapedotomy. Stapedotomy gives better results than stapedectomy in this serie. Stereophony is achieved in 75% of overall cases with stapedotomy but normal hearing is achieved in only 53% of unilateral pre operative hearing loss.

COMMENTS

Stapedotomy is a more effective technique in this serie. Crossing informations achieved using AAO-HNS guidelines and GBP leads to give a more realistic and comprehensive understanding to patients who will undergo surgery for otosclerosis.

摘要

研究目的

对于耳硬化症手术,突出使用美国耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学会(AAO - HNS)关于传导性听力损失的指南和格拉斯哥获益图(GBP)所获得的交叉信息的重要性。次要目的:比较有无静脉植入的镫骨切除术。机构:半乡村综合医院的参考耳科中心和市区的私立机构。

材料与方法

一项回顾性双中心研究,比较了1998年至2004年间129例耳硬化症初次手术病例。分为3组:无静脉植入的镫骨切除术(92例)、有静脉植入的镫骨切除术(27例)、镫骨足板切除术(10例)。结果依据AAO - HNS指南和GBP给出。

使用的统计分析方法

方差分析检验和t检验(p < 0.05),对手术前后耳间差异进行图形分析。

结果

气导(AC)阈值的主要获益为23至25分贝,两种镫骨切除技术之间无统计学差异。在本系列中,镫骨切除术的效果优于镫骨足板切除术。镫骨切除术总体病例中有75%实现了立体声,但术前单侧听力损失的病例中只有53%恢复到正常听力。

评论

在本系列中,镫骨切除术是一种更有效的技术。使用AAO - HNS指南和GBP获得的交叉信息能让即将接受耳硬化症手术的患者有更现实和全面的了解。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验