Peake I, Goodeve A
Academic Unit of Haematology, University of Sheffield School of Medicine and Biomedical Science, Sheffield, UK.
J Thromb Haemost. 2007 Jul;5 Suppl 1:7-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2007.02488.x.
Since its first description in 1926, the precise nature and indeed significance of von Willebrand factor (VWD) in the area of human bleeding has been unsure and often controversial. The recognition of VWD as a distinct entity in blood and the cloning of the von Willebrand factor (VWF) gene in the 1980s encouraged both phenotypic and genotypic studies, culminating in 1994 with the recognition, by the VWF subcommittee of the Scientific and Standardization Committee (SSC) of International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasy (ISTH), of three types of VWD, characterized by severe plasma VWF deficiency (type 3), functionally deficient plasma VWF (type 2) and reduced (below normal) levels of plasma VWF, which is functionally essentially normal (type 1; 70% of all cases). Since then, whereas gene analysis has recognized VWF gene (VWF) mutations in most individuals with type 3 and type 2 disease, the latter mutations correlating well with recognized functional domains within the VWF protein, few mutations have been reported in cases with type 1 VWD. This led to speculation that other factors, particularly ABO blood group, may be primarily responsible for the majority of such patients, perhaps combined with a generic bleeding tendency throughout the normal population. Recent large studies in Europe and Canada have considerably clarified this situation, revealing that the majority of type 1 VWD is associated with mutations within VWF. The role of these mutations in the aetiology of the disease opens up new approaches to the study of the diagnosis and treatment of the condition. Conversely, the lack of a change in the VWF gene in many recruited families will lead to enhanced efforts to identify non-VWF gene causes both at the genetic and epigenetic level.
自1926年首次被描述以来,血管性血友病因子(VWD)在人类出血领域的确切性质及实际意义一直不明确,且常常存在争议。20世纪80年代,血管性血友病因子(VWD)被确认为血液中的一种独特实体,同时血管性血友病因子(VWF)基因被克隆,这推动了表型和基因型研究的开展。1994年,国际血栓与止血学会(ISTH)科学与标准化委员会(SSC)的VWF小组委员会确认了三种类型的VWD,其特征分别为严重的血浆VWF缺乏(3型)、功能缺陷的血浆VWF(2型)以及血浆VWF水平降低(低于正常)但功能基本正常(1型;占所有病例的70%)。从那时起,基因分析已在大多数3型和2型疾病患者中识别出VWF基因突变,后者的突变与VWF蛋白内公认的功能域密切相关,但1型VWD患者中报告的突变较少。这引发了一种推测,即其他因素,尤其是ABO血型,可能是大多数此类患者的主要原因,或许还与正常人群普遍存在的出血倾向有关。欧洲和加拿大最近的大型研究极大地澄清了这种情况,表明大多数1型VWD与VWF基因内的突变有关。这些突变在该疾病病因中的作用为该疾病的诊断和治疗研究开辟了新途径。相反,许多招募家庭中VWF基因未发生变化,这将促使人们在基因和表观遗传层面加大力度寻找非VWF基因的病因。